🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2A65420D.10888@ics.uci.edu> mludwig@ics.uci.edu (Michael Scott Ludwig) writes:
>=BTW - If you're going to point to EPA and Los Gatos and talk about how
>=we can't have local only taxes because EPA can't support itself, I'll
>=point out that under the current system, no one else does either.
>
>You went over my head on this one - I didn't see a single article that
>mentioned either the EPA or Los Gatos (the EPA shouldn't be in this
>discussion anyway, since it is funded by the national gov't, not the state).

East Palo Alto was very much part of the discussion, as in "EPA needs
subsidies from other areas because it can't pay for necessary
services".  It should be part of the discussion, because it
demonstrates that the status quo doesn't have the properties
attributed to it, the properties that argue against its replacement.

-andy
--
UUCP:    {arpa gateways, sun, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!cs.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA:    andy@cs.stanford.edu