🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul10.193733.28088@morrow.stanford.edu> karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish) writes:
>In article <1992Jul9.170051.1278@pbhya.PacBell.COM> whheydt@PacBell.COM
>(Wilson Heydt) quotes himself:
>>On the face of it, if an attempt were made by EF antagonists in No.
>>Calif., I'd've expected them to have been shot while driving along a
>>rural road.  Bombs aren't very characteristic of the EF opponets,
>>either.
>
>Assuming that the particular antagonists involved are
>individual loggers.  The timber industry has a big
>financial stake in continued easy access to forest
>resources.  I wouldn't be surprised to see them
>use dirty tricks to try to discredit a tenacious
>opponent.

I don't dispute that a great many people in the lumber industry would
be very happy to see the last of EF--dead or alive.  My disagreement
is over *how* that is likely to be done.  I haven't seen anything done
that makes a bombing a particularly likely method for them to use.  If
your *real* fond of conspiracy theories, that makes a bomb a good
choice, but that isn't the way I see it.

	--Hal
-- 
Hal Heydt                    |    "Boycott Time-Warner"
Analyst, Pacific*Bell        |         --J. Danforth Quayle
510-823-5447                 |    "... kill all the lawyers."
whheydt@pbhya.PacBell.COM    |         --William Shakespeare