🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2A61A8B3.11345@noiro.acs.uci.edu> mrichey@mothra.nts.uci.edu (Mike Richey) writes:
>In article <1992Jul10.164851.9609@pbhya.PacBell.COM> whheydt@PacBell.COM (Wilson Heydt) writes:
>>In article <2A5CC116.26641@noiro.acs.uci.edu> mrichey@mothra.nts.uci.edu (Mike Richey) writes:
>>>In article <1992Jul9.170051.1278@pbhya.PacBell.COM> whheydt@PacBell.COM (Wilson Heydt) writes:
>>>>A bomb is a very indiscriminate weapon.  In that sense, it is a
>>>>consistent escalation of prior EF activity (that of targeting classes
>>>>rather than individuals) than of EFs opponents.
>>>
>>>Again, more assumptions.
>>
>>What, pray tell do you think I am assuming?

>>(I'm *not* assuming that anyone in particular built/placed the device,
>>just pointing that there is logic and consistentcy in it being 'owned'
>>by EF folks.)
>
>That EF! has taken to producing bombs. There is no evidence of this.
>period. it's been mentioned how some people who are not familiar with
>ef! may believe that the bombing incident may believe what has been in
>the press. 

I believe I have included enough material to disprove your contention
that I assumed the device was built by EF.

While it is true that I consider that to be the strongest possibility,
I did *not* assume it to be the case.  I *did* assume that logical
arguments would be understood.

	--Hal
-- 
Hal Heydt                    |    "Boycott Time-Warner"
Analyst, Pacific*Bell        |         --J. Danforth Quayle
510-823-5447                 |    "... kill all the lawyers."
whheydt@pbhya.PacBell.COM    |         --William Shakespeare