Article View: ca.general
Article #22534Re: Citibank: Deceptive Practices
From: Otha Stubblefield III
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1992 17:07
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1992 17:07
41 lines
2773 bytes
2773 bytes
dave@angmar.uucp (Dave Fuess) writes: >The "deceptive practice" which Citibank is supposed to have >engaged in is neither Citibanks nor deceptive. The news >yesterday reported that mail drop boxes are being hit by >gangs looking for credit cards which have not been delivered >yet. They can steal these and use them for at least a month >before the intended customer discovers the charges. All banks >are being asked to devise an activation method to prevent this >type of theft. The "deceptive practice" I am describing refers only to the first part of my posting in which Citibank may not send me a replacement card because I have not been paying more than the minimum balance. I have no literature that suggests that Citibank might reward/penalize you for paying the minimum asked. The second part of the article describes an incident with my sister that may or may not have gone well between her and Citibank. I don't know, yet. I only found out about it because she was using my computer to type the letter to Citibank, and the printer ran out of ink. In this part, I am not trying to fault Citibank for the lost card, since all evidence points to it being intercepted at one of the Post Office's Mail Processing facilities. However, I did want to add a pro-article to balance my con, if my sister's problem was resolved favorably. As far as "gangs" robbing mail drop boxes, are you referring to the actual mailbox, or some point in-between? In some cases, it is very easy to rob the "gang box", especially inf the "mailman's lock" is broken. A friend that used to live in a roach-infested apartment across from a housing project moved all-of-a-sudden; (10 days notice) -- a little too soon for her AFDC checks to be forwarded. She missed a check, and I went over to the landlord and asked if she had seen it, and possibly mixed it up with mail that was to be sent to a tenant that had also moved. The landlord looked in the box (for my benefit) and said that she had not seen it. It was later proven that the landlord had cashed the check. I -- I'm a man of fire It's a buring thing It'll burn on forever If you feed me baby
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ostubble.696271181@uclagsm>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-mic!agsm!ostubbleReferences:
<ostubble.696186890@uclagsm> <116341@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,9bef702475543224 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-24 09:27:17 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-mic!agsm!ostubble From: ostubble@agsm.ucla.edu (Otha Stubblefield III) Newsgroups: ca.general Subject: Re: Citibank: Deceptive Practices Message-ID: <ostubble.696271181@uclagsm> Nntp-Posting-Host: risc.agsm.ucla.edu References: <ostubble.696186890@uclagsm> <116341@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Distribution: ca Date: 24 Jan 92 09:07:34 PST