Article View: ca.general
Article #329Re: our school problems
From: Jordan Hayes
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 22:37
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 22:37
22 lines
1459 bytes
1459 bytes
Kim A. Berry <kberry@sactoh0.sac.ca.us> writes: I oppose U.C. Berkeley's practice of having different admission standards for each race. Each race competes for slots only with members of their own race rather than against all applicants. Special treatment of certain groups breeds resentment. Oh, I don't know -- I know my time at UCB was better for them having given better access to targeted populations that otherwise would have gotten lost in the paperwork. Face facts -- UCB gets tons more applicants than they have slots for. If they simply took the top of that cream, how homogeneous might it be? How much *less* potential does some 4.0 student who came from the inner city and who, because of factors outside of his direct control (like nutrition) got a 1500 SAT score instead of the 1520 cutoff ... hypothetical numbers, but the point is that without that policy (which just got dropped? didn't I see something in the papers last week about this?), what would UCB look like? /jordan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5259@bacon.IMSI.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!bacon!jordanReferences:
<1992Oct7.045249.11119@sactoh0.sac.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!bacon!jordan From: jordan@IMSI.COM (Jordan Hayes) Newsgroups: ca.general Subject: Re: our school problems Message-ID: <5259@bacon.IMSI.COM> Date: 7 Oct 92 22:37:48 GMT References: <1992Oct7.045249.11119@sactoh0.sac.ca.us> Sender: news@bacon.IMSI.COM Organization: Investment Management Services Inc., NYC Lines: 22