Article View: ca.water
Article #278Re: California Flood Protection
From: Mark
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00
93 lines
6339 bytes
6339 bytes
Dear Richard Penny: >From your below post I am in question as to the purpose of the Friends of the River (F.O.R.). Is it F.O.R or F.O.R. Flood?? --------------------------------------------------------- Richard Penny wrote: > > Media Advisory Contact: Charles Casey > January 7, 1997 916/442-3155 > > River group calls for review of existing flood protection system > > Sacramento - Friends of the River (F.O.R.), California's largest river > conservation group, today suggested that a reassessment of the Central > Valley's existing flood control facilities be initiated in light of the > damaging 1997 floods. > > "It is clear where and when flood officials have paid close attention to > existing structures and operations - the American River flood control > system, for example - that flood control facilities can work well," said > Betsy Reifsnider, executive director at F.O.R. "We certainly don't need to > straitjacket our rivers or build a series of new dams to fight the floods > we've seen. Indeed, it's ironic that some of the worst flooding has been > just downstream from two of the largest dams in the state: Oroville and Don > Pedro dams." > > Reifsnider noted that in the Sacramento area the American River flood > control system worked well during the recent storms, largely because of the > efforts of flood officials and F.O.R. during the past decade. As a result > of intensive analysis, planning, and actual construction, the federal dam > at Folsom is now operated much more prudently during the flood season, > levees have been bolstered and strengthened, and American River levees in > particular are targeted for much more work because Congress - prompted by > F.O.R. lobbying efforts - approved a $57 million flood control package for > the capital city area late last year. > > Despite those forthcoming improvements, there is still more work that > can be done along the American River. Enlarging the river outlet works and > lowering the spillways at Folsom Dam would offer much more flexibility and > safety during large storm events. Couple that with raising and improving > downstream banks and levees along the American River and Sacramento will > enjoy even more flood protection. > > "The recent flooding throughout the Central Valley underscores the fact > that we do not need something like an Auburn dam. A structure on the North > Fork of the American River - no matter how big or expensive - would have > done nothing for the people and property hit by flooding along the Feather, > Bear, Cosumnes, San Joaquin, Mokelumne, Stanislaus or Tuolumne rivers," > said Ron Stork, associate conservation director and flood control > specialist for F.O.R. "Let's get serious about evaluating our flood > control system and stop wasting time on an unnecessary, billion dollar dam > that would be located on an earthquake fault." > > Borrowing in part from the 1994 federal task force recommendations that > followed the Mississippi floods (a study by the Interagency Floodplain > Management Review Committee known as the "Galloway Report"), Friends of the > River makes the following suggestions for improving public safety while > preserving the important features of the state's rivers: > > * Analyze and reassess the entire flood system in the Central Valley; > * Consider levee reinforcement, upgrades and future setbacks in order to > > improve waterway conveyance reliability and efficiency; > * Improve flood control operations at existing dams; > * Make better land use and floodplain management decisions so people can > safely > build, or simply avoid building, in at-risk areas; > * Encourage more hazard mitigation in flood prone areas, including such things > as buyouts, floodproofing buildings by elevating them, flood warning system > improvements, and increased flood hazard awareness programs; > * Encourage flood insurance for those at risk. > > "These are common sense, cost-effective solutions for much greater > public safety, while at the same time preserving and restoring our river > systems," said Stork. "We don't need new dams as much as we need to > upgrade and improve the aging infrastructure that's already in place. The > best and most environmentally responsible investment we can make is in the > existing flood control system. Obviously, there's plenty of room for > improvement." he added. > > Stork, who last year led the environmental efforts to secure flood > protection improve- ments for Sacramento without the Auburn dam, emphasized > that California should make sure the existing systems are more reliable, > safe and effective. He noted that the devastating levee breaks appear to > be a result of inattention, lack of investment, or woefully inadequate room > for rivers to flow. > > Friends of the River is nearly 25 years old. Based in Sacramento, > F.O.R. is a membership organization that works on a variety of > river-related issues throughout the state. For more information on flood > control or other river issues, contact Charles Casey: (916) 442-3155. > > # # #
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32D50EA2.1C0A@atnet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<rpenny-ya023580000801970842020001@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe1ad,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe1ad,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: f84dc,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gidf84dc,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Thread: 108860,7100239bd52e1620 X-Google-Attributes: gid108860,public From: Mark <mebooker@atnet.net> Subject: Re: California Flood Protection Date: 1997/01/09 Message-ID: <32D50EA2.1C0A@atnet.net> X-Deja-AN: 208866409 references: <rpenny-ya023580000801970842020001@nntp.ix.netcom.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: mebooker@atnet.net newsgroups: ca.water,ca.environment,rec.boats.paddle,talk.environment,sci.environment,alt.org.sierra-club x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)