Article View: ca.water
Article #347Re: Operations Technical Forum on the District web?
From: umashivpatel
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:18
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:18
47 lines
3413 bytes
3413 bytes
On Tuesday, September 7, 1999 8:00:00 AM UTC+1, Lynda Schafhauser wrote: > Hi Bill. Thanks for the information and recommendation. For the Public > Folder option... What is necessary to set this up, and, can this be put > on the desktop with a short-cut icon? > > > ---------- > > From: Bill Ray > > Sent: August 12, 1999 11:40 PM > > To: Lynda Schafhauser > > Cc: Don Erba; Stan Wallis; Chuck Coody; Roger Dollarhide; Ken Baker; > > Sandy Oblonsky; Heinz Haase > > Subject: RE: Operations Technical Forum on the District web? > > > > There are only two ways presently to keep the forum selective or > > private, one is with an email group list the other is a special folder > > on one of the servers in which only designated employees would have > > permission to access. All questions and responses would have to be > > typed in Word or Word Perfect and saved to this folder. > > > > My recommendation would be to start with an open Newsgroup. The format > > is already setup on email under Public Folders / Internet Newsgroups / > > ca / water. No one has ever used this folder and would be a good > > starting place, then if we start getting too much outside interference > > we could look at the alternatives. > > > > Bill > > ---------- > > From: Lynda Schafhauser > > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 1:32 PM > > To: Bill Ray > > Cc: Don Erba; Stan Wallis; Chuck Coody; Roger > > Dollarhide; Ken Baker; Sandy Oblonsky; Heinz Haase > > Subject: Operations Technical Forum on the District > > web? > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > I am researching the feasibility of putting an > > Operations Technical Forum format (something along the lines of the > > AWWA Technical Forum) on the District's internal network. This would > > possibly be pass word linked for only Operations and selected units to > > read and comment. Or would this type of communication be better > > served through a common file, preferably accessible through Exchange? > > Any information you may have is appreciated. Thanks, Lynda > > ================= [url=http//:www.peachtreeink.com]printer ink[/url]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<b6f2cba9-e976-48b9-9990-d37b183a82d9@googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!k2ni8440qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no14947620qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 8a2df0210b,77da10fc21e582c7
X-Google-Attributes: gid8a2df0210b,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.175.65 with SMTP id w1mr14886583qaz.7.1360142337413;
Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.15.6 with SMTP id t6mr2324064qec.20.1360142337397; Wed,
06 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!k2ni8440qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no14947620qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: ca.water
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.168.250.16;
posting-account=2Fg86QoAAABuXMxSv1wtPcweVA54RtYV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.168.250.16
References: <71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b6f2cba9-e976-48b9-9990-d37b183a82d9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Operations Technical Forum on the District web?
From: umashivpatel@gmail.com
Cc: Bill Ray <BillRay@scvwd.dst.ca.us>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:18:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1