🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.water
Article #347

Re: Operations Technical Forum on the District web?

#347
From: umashivpatel
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:18
47 lines
3413 bytes
On Tuesday, September 7, 1999 8:00:00 AM UTC+1, Lynda Schafhauser wrote:
> Hi Bill. Thanks for the information and recommendation.  For the Public
> Folder option... What is necessary to set this up, and, can this be put
> on the desktop with a short-cut icon?
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	Bill Ray
> > Sent: 	August 12, 1999 11:40 PM
> > To: 	Lynda Schafhauser
> > Cc: 	Don Erba; Stan Wallis; Chuck Coody; Roger Dollarhide; Ken Baker;
> > Sandy Oblonsky; Heinz Haase
> > Subject: 	RE: Operations Technical Forum on the District web?
> > 
> > There are only two ways presently to keep the forum selective or
> > private, one is with an email group list the other is a special folder
> > on one of the servers in which only designated employees would have
> > permission to access. All questions and responses would have to be
> > typed in Word or Word Perfect and saved to this folder. 
> > 
> > My recommendation would be to start with an open Newsgroup. The format
> > is already setup on email under Public Folders / Internet Newsgroups /
> > ca / water. No one has ever used this folder and would be a good
> > starting place, then if we start getting too much outside interference
> > we could look at the alternatives. 
> > 
> > Bill
> > 		----------
> > 		From:  Lynda Schafhauser
> > 		Sent:  Thursday, August 12, 1999 1:32 PM
> > 		To:  Bill Ray
> > 		Cc:  Don Erba; Stan Wallis; Chuck Coody; Roger
> > Dollarhide; Ken Baker; Sandy Oblonsky; Heinz Haase
> > 		Subject:  Operations Technical Forum on the District
> > web?
> > 
> > 		Hi Bill,
> > 
> > 		I am researching the feasibility of putting an
> > Operations Technical Forum format (something along the lines of the
> > AWWA Technical Forum) on the District's internal network.  This would
> > possibly be pass word linked for only Operations and selected units to
> > read and comment.  Or would this type of communication be better
> > served through a common file, preferably accessible through Exchange?
> > Any information you may have is appreciated.  Thanks, Lynda
> >
=================
[url=http//:www.peachtreeink.com]printer ink[/url]
Technical Details
Message-ID: <b6f2cba9-e976-48b9-9990-d37b183a82d9@googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!k2ni8440qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no14947620qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 8a2df0210b,77da10fc21e582c7
X-Google-Attributes: gid8a2df0210b,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.175.65 with SMTP id w1mr14886583qaz.7.1360142337413;
        Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.15.6 with SMTP id t6mr2324064qec.20.1360142337397; Wed,
 06 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!k2ni8440qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no14947620qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: ca.water
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:18:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.168.250.16;
 posting-account=2Fg86QoAAABuXMxSv1wtPcweVA54RtYV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.168.250.16
References: <71DA7361991DD2118D450800096B1979067403@srv450>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b6f2cba9-e976-48b9-9990-d37b183a82d9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Operations Technical Forum on the District web?
From: umashivpatel@gmail.com
Cc: Bill Ray <BillRay@scvwd.dst.ca.us>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:18:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1