Re: These newsgroups are proposed for deletion

Article View: can.ai

Article #39

#39

From: Brian Nixon
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 1985 18:50

18 lines
1237 bytes

A volume of traffic is a good reason to create a separate newsgroup.
On the other hand, a low volume is not necessarily a good reason to
remove a group.

If you don't receive any mail for a week, how would you feel if the
letter carrier cemented-over your mailbox?

Is there any cost associated with retaining a newsgroup?

The consensus here is to retain at least can.ai .
There are some mixed feelings re can.ai.cscsi .

Yves Lesperance,     Brian Nixon      and  Taro Shibahara
utcsrgv!lesperan     utcsrgv!nixon         utcsrgv!utai!taro

Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.  M5S 1A4
-- 
Brian Nixon

Technical Details

Message-ID: <705@utcsrgv.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsrgv!nixon

References: <285@lsuc.UUCP> <286@lsuc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsrgv!nixon
From: nixon@utcsrgv.UUCP (Brian Nixon)
Newsgroups: can.ai,can.ai.cscsi,can.followup,can.map
Subject: Re: These newsgroups are proposed for deletion
Message-ID: <705@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 25-Jan-85 13:50:53 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.705
Posted: Fri Jan 25 13:50:53 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 14:42:12 EST
References: <285@lsuc.UUCP> <286@lsuc.UUCP>
Distribution: can
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message