Re: Canadian AI

Article View: can.ai

Article #52

#52

From: Geoff Loker
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1985 15:25

17 lines
1347 bytes

> Dear Mr. Taylor
> 
> Many people doing AI research in Canada stay here because they can avoid
> doing any defense related research.  That's why the SDI topic is of such
> interest.  We needn't prove you are wrong...we all know that.
> 
> Randy Goebel

   Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that the point of Mr. Taylor's
article was that it would be nice to see a bit of discussion about what
is happening in Canadian AI (seeing as that's what the name of this newsgroup
seems to be about).  Admittedly, the SDI question is interesting, etc., but
it isn't really discussion about Canadian AI - it is more politics than
anything else.  
   I would like to second Mr. Taylor's plea for some discussion of AI on this
net, and not just debate about SDI (after all, this isn't net.SDI or can.SDI).
How about it?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <411@utai.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!gkloker

References: <1503@dciem.UUCP> <423@water.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utai.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utcsri!utai!gkloker
From: gkloker@utai.UUCP (Geoff Loker)
Newsgroups: can.ai
Subject: Re: Canadian AI
Message-ID: <411@utai.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Apr-85 10:25:44 EST
Article-I.D.: utai.411
Posted: Thu Apr  4 10:25:44 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Apr-85 11:42:22 EST
References: <1503@dciem.UUCP> <423@water.UUCP>
Distribution: can
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message