Article View: can.atlantic.general
Article #185Re: Liberals soft on crime. (remember for the next elections)
From: Canuck57
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:27
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:27
88 lines
5250 bytes
5250 bytes
abc wrote: > Liberal senators blasted by Tories, NDP for blocking crime bill > > > October 7, 2009 > > > Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, shown here in a March 2009 file > photo, blasted Liberal senators on Wednesday for watering down > legislation designed to remove credit for time served by offenders > awaiting sentencing. > > Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, shown here in a March 2009 file > photo, blasted Liberal senators on Wednesday for watering down > legislation designed to remove credit for time served by offenders > awaiting sentencing. > Photograph by: Chris Wattie, Reuters > > OTTAWA � Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson blasted Liberal > senators on Wednesday, accusing them of watering down legislation > designed to remove credit for time served by offenders awaiting > sentencing. > > The legislation, supported by provincial governments across the > country, would eliminate a common practice among judges, when > sentencing offenders, to credit them on a two-for-one basis for each > day spent in detention > > But the Senate legal and constitutional affairs committee voted to > change the proposed legislation so that offenders would receive a > credit of 1.5 days for each day served in pre-sentence custody � but > that judges would retain their discretion to sentence up to two days or > as they see fit. > > "I believe the bill has been gutted," Nicholson told Canwest News > Service. "Judges will have the discretion to give up to two-to-one, > which is exactly what we had taken aim at." > > NDP Leader Jack Layton also took aim at the senators, criticizing them > for not raising concerns about the legislation earlier. > > "Unelected senators shouldn't be standing in the way of the unanimous > will of the House when it comes to important laws," Layton said. "This > is another example why we shouldn't have unelected law makers in this > country and that the Senate should be abolished." > > Nicholson also criticized Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff for allowing > the senators to change the legislation. The justice minister said > there's a consensus among Canadians for more laws cracking down on > crime, but that the senators are delaying those changes by proposing > amendments. > > "I hope (the legislation) gets fixed in the main Senate," Nicholson > said. "This is why I have been asking since June, for Mr. Ignatieff to > step forward, to put some pressure, to show some leadership on this > issue and bring together some unity within his own political party on > all of these issues." > > But Liberal justice critic Dominic LeBlanc defended Ignatieff, > explaining that the Liberal MPs supported the government's legislation > and would work to reverse any changes proposed by the Senate. > > "Mr. Ignatieff is not like Mr. Harper. He doesn't order caucus members > around," said LeBlanc. "The Senate has a role to play but I can be very > clear that we don't believe the bill should be amended." > > The Harper government introduced its bill seven months ago amid > complaints from provincial governments and other critics that the > credit is being abused by accused offenders who drag out their trials > so they can cut their time in prison. > > Criminal lawyers have countered that judges can already deny time > credit to those who try to drag out their trials. The idea behind the > credit is to compensate for the harsh conditions in detention > facilities. > > The Senate as a whole, which is dominated by Liberals, must still pass > the amended version of the bill before it is sent back to the House of > Commons for vote, said Mark Roy, spokesman for the Liberals in the > Senate. > > The Commons can decide to reject the amendment and punt the bill back > to the Senate, which has traditionally accepted the will of the elected > MPs. > They are all soft on crime. That is why I don't vote NDP, Lib nor Cons any more. Which corrupt party of Kanada do you vote for?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<zJ1Am.118$Ku5.99@newsfe04.iad>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe04.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<20091008-025949.222.0@abc.shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 6b7cac3723,af21f4e6a4d5be2 X-Google-Attributes: gid6b7cac3723,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe04.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: Canuck57 <Canuck57@nospam.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: can.atlantic.general,can.taxes,soc.culture.quebec Subject: Re: Liberals soft on crime. (remember for the next elections) References: <20091008-025949.222.0@abc.shawnews.vc.shawcable.net> In-Reply-To: <20091008-025949.222.0@abc.shawnews.vc.shawcable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 88 Message-ID: <zJ1Am.118$Ku5.99@newsfe04.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.145.168.233 X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca X-Trace: newsfe04.iad 1255188447 68.145.168.233 (Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:27:27 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:27:27 UTC Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:27:24 -0600