🚀 go-pugleaf

rsnelson@portage.net (Bob nelson) writes:

> >What are you trying to say anyways?
> 
> Somewhere you objected to my "oblique" approach. Did you ever
> consider the other side of the coin. Your approach seems to be
> somewhere between bleak and oblique. Your prowess with a
> computer system is well known and respected. Some of your
> attitudes on other issues really bite.
> 
> You are not a god, although I do appreciate your sense of humour
> on that subject, you are however a most valuable asset. So
> where's your legacy when the information highway expropriates
> your house. Maybe you and the team should do some thinking
> about usenet politics.

Yes, what are you trying to say? Are you saying Lewis
rules the can.* heirarchy like a god? Are you saying
he exerts too much control? I'll tell you what,
why don't you post a newgroup control message
and create any can. group you want? Anyone with
access to control can do it. You don't have to
wait around until Chris Lewis does it. Now
if you do do that , you'll need to email every
sysadmin in Canada and explain why you think they
should honor that control message. Time consuming?
You bet. But there's your god-killer.

-- 
KAMAMER@IO.ORG.................................................
..Karl.Mamer,.President,.SOMWWTWTN..|."I.dunno..Some.of.it's ..
....Society.Of.Men.Who.Watch.The....|..pretty.interesting."....
.....Women's.Television.Network.....|...........--.Group.Moto..
.................................................KAMAMER@IO.ORG