🚀 go-pugleaf

rsnelson@portage.net (Bob nelson) writes:

> Try to understand something. Not everyone approaches a subject from
> the same point of view. Unlike you, I have no desire whatsoever to
> create a newsgroup. So I don't have to gain anyone's approval to
> achieve my task.

Ummm... you seem to have a problem with the way can.* newsgroups get
created. Why raise a stink if you have no desire to create a can.* 
newsgroup then?

> It is obvious that a certain atmosphere exists in this hierarcy, that
> is to some degree in conflict with the expectations of the thousands
> of new users of the Internet, and usenet in particular.

What exactly is that conflict? 

> Some will just take advantage of what is there, and could give a rat's
> ass if it's there tommorrow. If it isn't, something else will be.

Take advantage of what?

> Some will find it not to their liking, shrug and say, I don't need
> horsehit like this, and walk away with a bad taste in their mouth.

What?

> Some will try to work within the existing structure to bring about
> what they feel is positive change.

What kind of change? 

> The process is called internet politics. Not everyone practises the
> same brand of politics either. One thing is clear. If your not part of
> the solution, you just might be part of the problem.

Let's get this line of reasoning straight: One this is clear, 
I "might" be part of the problem? It's so clear that
it's only a possibility? What is the problem exactly?
You want to create a newsgroup, go ahead. No one is stopping
you. You want other people to eat up expensive hardware to
propegate your newsgroup, convince them that it's worth
their time.

I fail to see the problem or the politics in that.
-- 
KAMAMER@IO.ORG.................................................
..Karl.Mamer,.President,.SOMWWTWTN..|."I.dunno..Some.of.it's ..
....Society.Of.Men.Who.Watch.The....|..pretty.interesting."....
.....Women's.Television.Network.....|...........--.Group.Moto..
.................................................KAMAMER@IO.ORG