🚀 go-pugleaf

Just following a recommendation from a master (being very much a newbie) -
Quite frankly I don't care what the name ends up being so long is it is a
Canadian NG on bikes - seems that everybody has a distinctly different
opinion of how an seemingly unregulated environment should work....
Point is there are many US NG's and yes UK, AUSSIE on bikes but none that
are Pan-Canadian that I have found ...

Navydiver
02 750 Shadow ACE
Strength in Depth!
http://members.tripod.com/clearancediver/BikerPage.htm
http://members.tripod.com/clearancediver/

"_Bob Nixon_" <bilbo@nospam.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MpIHP8l3=53UFp4yeH9hJ4FynUhK@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:24:40 -0400, "navydiver" <navydiver@bigfoot.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I would like to start a new newsgroup with the title can.rec.motorcycles
> >
> >REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
> >unmoderated group can.rec.motorcycles
> >
> >This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) for the creation of the
> >group can.rec.motorcycles
> >
> >Newsgroups line:
> >can.rec.motorcycles The owners and users of Motorcycles and related
> >topics in Canada.
> >
> >RATIONALE: can.rec.motorcycles
>
> Not to belittle your attempt at creating a Canadian version of reccy but
> at least learn the USENET hierarchy beforehand.
>
> The proper grouping would be can.motorcycles, I believe. The REC or
> (recreational) hierarchy cannot be regional specific. Open all the
> newsgroups and you'll find CAN for the canadian groups. If you however
> wish to petition in the REC hierarchy then your group name would be
> rec.motorcycles.canadian or canada but I can tell you regional grouping
> within the REC hierarchy will not fly, so stick with CAN. BTW, there
> currently are: ba.motorcycles, tx.motorcycles and ny.motorcycles.
> ott.motorcycles, uk.motorcycles and so on.
>
>
>       01 Sprint ST "RED"
>      Bob Nixon, Phoenix Az.