Article View: can.domain
Article #39770Re: I was confused, then I wasn't, now I am again
From: Sid Van den Heede
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1993 17:21
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1993 17:21
40 lines
2870 bytes
2870 bytes
In article <1993Mar06.051200.10690@xenitec.on.ca> eah@xenitec.on.ca (Ed Hew) writes: >In article <1993Mar3.181820.21334@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> irving@sys.toronto.edu (Irving Reid) writes: >>CA-Registrar@cdnnet.ca (CA registrar) writes: >>>[As a registered proprietorship, this organization warrants a third >>>level subdomain name. --John] >> >>Now I'm really confused. I spent two months fighting with UUNET Canada >>over whether they would even bother to submit my application for a >>domain name in .on.ca. They finally convinced me that the rules were >>very firm; my (Ontario registered corporation) company would need to >>have _permanent_offices_ in at least two municipalities in Ontario in >>order to get a name in .on.ca, despite the fact that we are provincially >>registered and do international business. I got lucky. I submitted my application to UUNET Canada on Dec 1, just about the time they went through some personnel changes. My application was lost until I chased it up in February (i.e., after the rules had changed). I read an article that mentioned the provincial registration, so I started to discuss it with UUNET Canada. I am in the same situation as you (registered, international business), and I was given the same argument. So I posted a follow-up to the article that mentioned provincial registration, and Ed called me as a result and got involved to get an acceptable name approved. >UUNET Canada advised you correctly, in accordance with the guidelines >in place at that time. If you were to ask them today, you would get >a completely different response. The difference? The guidelines were >revised (more like rewritten), effective Feb 1st. I wonder if you would get a different response today. In mid-February (about 2 weeks ago) they tried very hard to convince me that I shouldn't even try to submit a third level request. The "provincial registration" article convinced me otherwise. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sid Van den Heede Van den Heede Computing sid@vdhcomp.on.ca 56 Margaret Ave South Phone/FAX +1 519 746 0576 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2J 2C9
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Mar6.172150.28418@vdhcomp.on.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca!vdhc!sidReferences:
<X26.19930301215221@peculier.cdnnet.ca> <1993Mar3.181820.21334@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1993Mar06.051200.10690@xenitec.on.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114bd6,65cd538de633088c X-Google-Attributes: gid114bd6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-06 11:55:19 PST Newsgroups: can.domain Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca!vdhc!sid From: sid@vdhcomp.on.ca (Sid Van den Heede) Subject: Re: I was confused, then I wasn't, now I am again Message-ID: <1993Mar6.172150.28418@vdhcomp.on.ca> Organization: Van den Heede Computing, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada References: <X26.19930301215221@peculier.cdnnet.ca> <1993Mar3.181820.21334@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1993Mar06.051200.10690@xenitec.on.ca> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1993 17:21:50 GMT Lines: 40