Article View: can.domain
Article #480Re: Internic.ca?
From: L
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:38
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:38
57 lines
3600 bytes
3600 bytes
I got a couple of emails ( spam ) saying I was already signed up with internic.ca ( we are not ), and to renew my .name with them at their site ( link to the interic.ca site ). I noticed that the email used to contact us was the one we used when we dealt with networksolutions ( internic.com ). It's the only time we ever used that email, so we know it originates from the publicly available database from NetSol, but I don't know if they bought it or if its netsol. I also noticed that cvo.ca, is owned by internic.ca has the word internic.com in their meta tags. see: http://www.cvo.ca Also, they register .name .org and .coms. I believe that the agreement between U.S. Department of commerce and At&t ( or verisign...? ) states that no one is to use the word or service mark 'internic' for domain registration purposes. (T-Shirts=OK Domains=No ) Internic.ca registers .com .org and .net currently under the jurisdiction of the agreement. ( oops! ) Check their site. They own namescout.com and that's who does the .com registrations i think... ( Check ICANN ) When I looked into the company, I found that it is owned by THE founder of CIRA. ( from their site ) They were the first ones to be awarded some kind of status of some sorts. One of the employees of internic.ca (some lady ) is also currently on the CIRA board, so it all looks official to me. They also have trademarked the term internic for canada, so no one can use it anymore. Last time I checked, The trade mark act states that you cannot claim a name which is 'confusing or misleading to the canadian public', so they must be the official place, or THE internic for canada. no? Either way though, if they are affiliated, then they are in violation of the agreement. If not, then I guess there isn't much we can do. P.S. Watch for the email and let me know if you see it. I saved my copies for future reference. Thanks! "Ed Hew" <eah@enigma.xenitec.on.ca> wrote in message news:GuKp03.J9y@enigma.xenitec.on.ca... > In article <qfku8.15412$f5.1086748@news>, L <spammagnet@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Is InterNic.ca the official InterNic for canada? > > Is internic.ca claiming that they are? > > >Are they more official than the other registrars? > > Many. > Check the definitive CIRA Certified Registrar list at www.cira.ca . > > --ed (Ed Hew) > -- > CA Registry, CIRA Certified Registrar > http://www.registry.ca/ > <registry@cs.utoronto.ca>,<registrar@registry.ca>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<iXru8.15450$f5.1097478@news>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!feed-ev1!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!news.davin.ottawa.on.ca!nntp.magma.ca!news!not-for-mailReferences:
<qfku8.15412$f5.1086748@news> <GuKp03.J9y@enigma.xenitec.on.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114bd6,c2eff64739f3156b X-Google-Attributes: gid114bd6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-14 20:40:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!feed-ev1!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!news.davin.ottawa.on.ca!nntp.magma.ca!news!not-for-mail From: "L" <spammagnet@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: can.domain References: <qfku8.15412$f5.1086748@news> <GuKp03.J9y@enigma.xenitec.on.ca> Subject: Re: Internic.ca? Lines: 59 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <iXru8.15450$f5.1097478@news> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 03:38:54 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.26.163.139 X-Trace: news 1018841934 64.26.163.139 (Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:38:54 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:38:54 EDT Organization: Magma Communications Ltd.