🚀 go-pugleaf

"Andrew Chaplin" <ab.chaplin@yourfinger.rogers.com> wrote in message 
news:4vGdnfh5ovV7MSbZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> "C Charland" <ccharland@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
> news:bADug.46590$Uy1.27684@read1.cgocable.net...
>>
>> "Brian Daily" <daily.brian@gmail.com.nomaps> wrote in message
>> news:12sgb25q5871v9b45von5kpiojr79gu8us@4ax.com...
>> > http://www.newswire.co.nz/main/viewstory.aspx?storyid=326760&catid=33
>> >
> <snip>
>>
>> Are you the same Brian Daily who was booted out of the military for being 
>> a
>> pedophile?
>
> At the risk of bringing these arguments to ad hominem, Chris, if there are 
> any
> details which are not protected under the Privacy Act and would not leave 
> you
> vulnerable to a libel suit, could you post them or links to them? I am 
> curious
> to know of any underlying reason for his modus argumenti.
> -- 
> Andrew Chaplin
> SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
> (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
>
>
I assume the privacy act is similar to the US FOIA.

You need only the name and make the request, private matters
such as criminal behavior *may not be included in US DD 214's.
That is the discharge papers number.
Social security numbers are also prohibited from public
view.
A discharge is a public document and all have the right to
examine one.
Where, units and dates, military work and schools are allowed to be seen
A bad discharge is included with public viewing.
So far no one has been charged a dime in the US for the military discharge 
FOIA.

Andrew, I am still looking at Mills site, I am puzzeld on the 44th dates
as to coming here to N. America.
Well, there is much  more to read.