🚀 go-pugleaf

 Inmates sue feds over feelings of 'hopelessness'=
Criminals Deserve DP?

Bring back the death penalty, especially for crooked judges,
lawyers, cops and politicians.

Death penalty to be executed within 30 days of conviction by a jury
and no useless appeals after jury convicts.

Some of the types of criminals meriting execution,
but not limited to such, would include:
         rapists
         drug dealers
         AIDS spreaders
         any spreader of any disease,including STD - this would
             obviously  include most faggots
         home invaders
         armed robbers
         pederasts and similar child molesters
         crooked liars/lawyers
         corrupt judges
         corrupt politicians
         insane anti-DP supporters such as despicable Desi??
         members of parole boards allowing dangerous criminals free
         useless psychiatrists responsible for criminals being released
         company execs involved in frauds
         drug dealers
         corrupt public officials, like in AHS
         useless parole board officials releasing repeat offenders
         habitual offenders with more than 3 convictions
         

Just a few, with more to follow.

More suggestions for both categories are invited.

Some popular methods for extermination of such vermin would include:
         crucifixion, as recommended by intphase
         vivisection
         medical experiments without anaesthetic
         target practice for police and military
         beheading
         hanging
         barbecueing by electrocution
         drawing & quartering
         incineration/ovening
Additional methods of execution have been suggested, such as:
    guillotining, very popular in France
    flaying alive until dead
    stoning to death - popular in some jurisdictions
Suggestions are invited, on all the above points.

I know many of you feel that despicable  KARLA HOMOLKA, even under new
alias, 
should be mentioned, so I have.
Which method for it would be most suitable??

Glad to see that NY Times supports televising executions.

> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:05:42 -0500
> Subject: NY Times: Executions Should Be Televised

> Executions Should Be Televised
> Aug 3 2011
 
> EARLIER this month, Georgia conducted its third execution
> this year. This would have passed relatively unnoticed
> if not for a controversy surrounding its videotaping.
> Lawyers for the condemned inmate, Andrew Grant DeYoung,
> had persuaded a judge to allow the recording of his last
> moments as part of an effort to obtain evidence on whether
> lethal injection caused unnecessary suffering.
 
> Though he argued for videotaping, one of Mr. DeYoung�s
> defense lawyers, Brian Kammer, spoke out against releasing
> the footage to the public. "It�s a horrible thing that
> Andrew DeYoung had to go through," Mr. Kammer said, "and
> it�s not for the public to see that."

> We respectfully disagree. Executions in the United States
> and Canada ought to be made public.

> Right now, executions are generally open only to the
> press and a few select witnesses. For the rest of us,
> the vague contours are provided in the morning paper.
> Yet a functioning democracy demands maximum
> accountability and transparency. As long as executions
> remain behind closed doors, those are impossible. The
> people should have the right to see what is being done
> in their name and with their tax dollars.

> This is particularly relevant given the current
> debate on whether specific methods of lethal
> injection constitute cruel and unusual punishment
> and therefore violate the Constitution.
 
> There is a dramatic difference between reading or hearing
> of such an event and observing it through image and sound.
> (This is obvious to those who saw the footage of Saddam
> Hussein�s hanging in 2006 or the death of Neda Agha-Soltan
> during the protests in Iran in 2009.) We are not calling
> for opening executions completely to the public � conducting
> them before a live crowd � but rather for broadcasting them
> live or recording them for future release, on the Web or TV.

> Like many of our fellow citizens, we are deeply conflicted
> about the death penalty and how it has been administered.
> Our focus is on accountability and openness. As Justice
> John Paul Stevens wrote in Baze v. Rees, a 2008 case involving
> a challenge to lethal injection, capital punishment is too
> often "the product of habit and inattention rather than an
> acceptable deliberative process that weighs the costs and
> risks of administering that penalty against its identifiable
> benefits."

> A democracy demands a citizenry as informed as possible
> about the costs and benefits of society�s ultimate punishment.

There has been much discussion regarding the advantages
of televising executions.
A few more thoughts on the subject.

The State can in fact auction off the rights to each and every
execution. The proceeds thereof could be allocated to the
VICTIMS of the criminals executed.
The victims and their families should have the RIGHT to
not only determine the method of execution, but should also
have the right and privilege of executing the criminals themselves.

> http://tinyurl.com/3t98ocg

Notice that the criminals sporge in response to the article,
because they are so illiterate they can not respond to the points
intelligently.

An executed criminal will never re-offend.