Article View: can.general
Article #38463Re: The Blameless Society -> Tobacco / Drugs
From: Daniel J. Hertzman
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:26
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:26
51 lines
3495 bytes
3495 bytes
> [snipped to one item for a personal rant] > > > BTW, I heard the other day that legal prescription drugs kill 10 times more > people every year than illegal street drugs. 10 frickin' times. Ain't that > charming? > Hmmm, where did you get that stat... I would be curious as to how people use prescription drugs vs. illegal drugs, and how much of each, I would hazard a guess that at least 10 times more prescription drugs are used that illegal street drugs. Also I would be curious how they defined death by prescription drugs. E.g., If a patient w/ cardiac disease is given a blood thinner that isn't strong enough, and the patient dies did s/he die because of the prescption drug? > Sounds to me like the "war on drugs" would be a lot more beneficial if it > was aimed at reckless pharmaceutical companies and physicians instead of pot > farmers. I happen to opposed to the war on drugs myself, but I suspect taht it would be equally fruitless sent against the targets you suggest. And 'mericans wouldn't even have to travel outside their borders to > wage war. But what fun would that be? Bwwwaaa haaa... yeah, I'm dreamin' of > course. There's waaaay too much money in the legal drug trade, so hipocracy > reigns. Keep on rockin' in the free world. > > Anyone besides me suspect that Aspirin would be illegal if it grew on a > house plant? (I guess I'd better not mention anything about wolf willow.) No, it wouldn't be illegal in that case, though Aspirin would be illegal if it grew in a houseplant AND gave you a high, but anything that gives you a high would be illegal (the exception being alcohol and cigarettes of course which have the luxury of what is basically a grandfather clause). I'm not saying its a good way to determine the illegality of a substance, but it is the one we presently use in our country. > > OK, I'm gettin' carried away. This Fair Trade coffee really packs a > wallop... > Speaking of which, by the unnatural high standard, coffee also would probably be illegal because of the caffeine. Daniel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fugs6.28988$ZT5.737137@news.total.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!portc03.blue.aol.com!peerfeed.news.psi.net!news-feed2.tiac.net!news.total.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<vvQq6.9653$tr5.953722@news1.telusplanet.net> <3AABEA44.9E54AA46@escape.ca> <8W5s6.5186$tn1.67410@news1.mts.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,9173a0f43b9a6542 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,9173a0f43b9a6542 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,9173a0f43b9a6542 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 10d4c6,9173a0f43b9a6542 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d4c6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-17 02:05:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!portc03.blue.aol.com!peerfeed.news.psi.net!news-feed2.tiac.net!news.total.net!not-for-mail From: "Daniel J. Hertzman" <NOdhertzSPAM@total.net> Newsgroups: can.general,can.legal,can.politics,us.politics References: <vvQq6.9653$tr5.953722@news1.telusplanet.net> <3AABEA44.9E54AA46@escape.ca> <8W5s6.5186$tn1.67410@news1.mts.net> Subject: Re: The Blameless Society -> Tobacco / Drugs Lines: 53 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <fugs6.28988$ZT5.737137@news.total.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:26:13 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.5.207.250 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.inter.net X-Trace: news.total.net 984716299 154.5.207.250 (Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:18:19 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:18:19 EST Organization: Inter.Net