🚀 go-pugleaf

"Gee-Haw Wimmy Diddle" <whimmy@diddler.com> wrote in message
news:kys2d.37236$KU5.23038@edtnps89...
> In article <Ocr2d.34$o77.538@news1.mts.net>, gNOSPAMhallick@mts.net
says...
> >
> >
> >"Gee-Haw Wimmy Diddle" <whimmy@diddler.com> wrote in message
> >news:B6l2d.43677$XP3.29792@edtnps84...
> >> In article <0Oj2d.2462$Uo1.15355@news1.mts.net>, gNOSPAMhallick@mts.net
> >says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"
> >> >The point that Geehaw-diddley-do-dipshit-whatever is missing while I
> >> >neglected to qualify my comments on TC being Henry Makow in my
original
> >> >post, I did rectify that error later on.
> >>
> >> And why are you calling me dipshit, asshole?
> >
> >Aaawww...did I hurt you feelings?
>
> no you piss me off, as mental midgets are want to do

It sure as hell doesn't take much.



> >
> >
> >> I never claimed you didn't
> >> qualify your comment after I challenged you.
> >
> >Challenged me?
>
> Yes I said "are you sure TC is Makow?"  And then you said you weren't
sure.
> And then Swan asked you why you didn't say you were sure in the first
place,
> and then Carter Lee claimed you did.

I don't give a flying fuck what Carter does. At least he'll give me an
arguement over something substaintial. You on the other are on a fullscale
tirade over something insignificant.


> I think it's pretty pathetic that you
> have to protect your shame by validating Carter's bogus claim.

Shame? I made a little mistake and owned up to it. When was the last time
you did that?


> >> You are as pathetic as
> >> he is, you see imaginary jew-envy conspiracies as much as Swan, TC and
> >Makow
> >> see imaginary jew conspiracies.
> >
> >Seeing imaginary Jew-envy conspiracies? Holy fuck you are whacked in the
> >head.
>
> holy fuck, what an argument!

Where's your arguement that I am supposedly seeing these imaginary jew-envy
conspiracies? Nowhere to be found, well other than only in your dreadfully
warped mind that is consumed by something so insignificant.

>
> >> I was involved in the thread from the start, shitfuck.  I'm the one who
> >told
> >> you Makow invented the board game Scruples.
> >
> >Actually if you want to get technical and you seem to such a person, I've
> >known for years that Makow invented Scruples. You telling me in your post
> >was really just overstating the obvious.
>
> Maybe so, but it certainly refutes your claim that I neglected to read the
> thread and therefore am 'confused' about something.  I'm not confused
about
> anything.  You're a mental midget, and so is Lee, and so is Swan.  Big
fucking
> deal, this usenet and that's the norm.

Hhhmmm...it wasn't that long ago you were angerly babbling away about
something you being insulted.


Glen