🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 01:59:25 GMT, John Corman <jcorman@server.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:57:15 GMT, David <davidj@home.com> wrote:
>
>>John Corman wrote:
>>
>>> But Lars, knowing the intellect of those who would actually listen to
>>> this screwball, they wouldn't know what year it was anyway.
>>
>>John Corman is a leading intellectual because he knows what year it is.
>=====================================================
>My goodness.  A scathing attack from what appears to be an unarmed
>warrior.  
>Do you actually want to debate the intellect of Maude and her
>followers David, or is this just a little gorilla warfare.  Hit and
>run, so to speak?
>If you do want to discuss the sanity of Maude and her followers, why
>don't we start with the "Banking Conspiracy".  That conspiracy,
>according to Maude and her ilk, had it that in the early nineties, the
>banks, in conspiracy with the Conservatives, maintained high interest
>rates as a pay back for their political support.  Funny though, how
>low interest rates in the mid to later part of the nineties resulted
>in the biggest earnings in the banks' history.  
>
>The next Maude conspiracy has it that the banks don't pay income
>taxes.  But that's probably a little too much for you to absorb all at
>once so we'll just leave that for the time being.
>
>John Corman ****** @server home.com


You're getting to an old softy, John.


EBB