🚀 go-pugleaf

Warman & CHRC =NAZIS- Zionist News+Jew Levant


Gay Ken McVay SOBC -  kmcvay at nizkor dotorg  wants all to know:

Zionist News + Jewish Lawyer Blast CHRC & Warman - As NAZIS!

Zionist owned newspaper National Post, and noted jurist 
Ezra Levant have blasted the Canadian Human Rights Commission, 
and pet complainer thereof Richard Warman.

They are  being denounced as NAZIS!

In a banner-headline huge editorial in the National Post, 
across Canada,on Wednesday July 15 2009, lawyer Ezra Levant 
really lays into CHRC and criminal Richard Warman.

Levant starts with a denunciation of the criminal activities 
of CHRC, as exposed at the CHRC hearing March 25 2008.

At that time Alain Monfette Bell Canada security officer, had 
testified that CHRC had illegally accessed the internet, using 
the private account of an innocent woman, Nelly Hechme.
Marc Lemire has in fact laid criminal charges against CHRC 
in connection with these criminal acts.

In his editorial, Lawyer Ezra Levant further denounces CHRC and
Richard Warman as NAZIS!

Levant states that CHRC members have been active members of
neo-nazi groups for years.

Further he states that they have published countless anti-semitic,
anti-gay and anti-black comments on the internet.

CHRC have even admitted these criminal acts under oath!

Dean Steacy, a senior CHRC member has testified that at least
7 CHRC staff are members of nazi groups.

Especially noted is that former CHRC investigator and current
serial witness and perpetual complainer RICHARD WARMAN is a
prominent NAZI among the seven!!

The tribunal investigating the illegal and criminal acts of CHRC
4 months ago, was forced to issue a damning report on the illegal
activities of CHRC and Warman:

"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-nazi] sites."

It appears that CHRC has more NAZI members than did the
Canadian Nazi Party when it existed briefly in the 1960's.


Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC

Ezra Levant, National Post  Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Last month, a parliamentary committee invited Jennifer Lynch, the head of 
the Canadian Human Rights Commission, to answer questions about her 
agency's conduct. She refused to attend, sending in her place a deputy who 
could not answer key questions put to him by MP Russ Hiebert.

Now that Parliament is safely on summer holidays, Lynch has bravely 
emerged from her bunker -- the CHRC office actually is a bulletproof 
bunker -- to accuse Hiebert of getting his facts wrong.

But it's Lynch's version that's false.

In her July 11 letter to the National Post, Lynch denies that CHRC staff 
hacked into the Internet account of a private citizen to cover their 
tracks as they logged into their memberships in neo-Nazi websites. Lynch 
says both the Privacy Commissioner and the RCMP "found no evidence to 
support this allegation."

But that's not true. The Privacy Commissioner's staff did not investigate 
the hacking -- that is not within their jurisdiction. They only examined 
"whether the CHRC improperly collected, used, disclosed or retained 
personal information about the complainant," a different and irrelevant 
question.

And neither did the RCMP declare that there was "no evidence" to the 
accusation. They investigated for months. Only when the case led them to a 
U. S.-based Internet server did they drop their investigation rather than 
pursue it internationally. That's quite a different thing from exonerating 
the CHRC.

There was a hearing into the matter, though, at the Canadian Human Rights 
Tribunal on March 25, 2008. Alain Monfette, Bell Canada's security 
officer, testified that the CHRC accessed the Internet using that private 
citizen's Bell account. Lynch's lawyers sat in embarrassed silence -- they 
did not rebut Monfette's evidence nor even bother to cross-examine him.

As Nelly Hechme, the hacking victim, told reporters, "I merely wanted some 
answers and maybe a little justice, but that doesn't seem to be the case. 
I feel like I'm basically being told to just accept it."

Lynch is pretending that Hechme doesn't even exist. But that pales in 
comparison to Lynch's statement that CHRC staff did not "post hateful 
messages on the Internet."

In fact, CHRC employees have been active members of neo-Nazi organizations 
for years, and have published countless anti-Semitic, anti-gay and anti-
black comments online. CHRC employees have admitted to this under oath. On 
the same day Monfette testified about the hacking, CHRC investigator Dean 
Steacy testified there were no guidelines about what CHRC staff could do 
using their online Nazi memberships.

Steacy, for example, used his Nazi membership to write encouraging words 
to a racist group called B. C. White Pride. He praised them, told them 
their racist posters were "great" and promised to distribute their 
literature. Your tax dollars at work.

Other CHRC investigators went further. One praised Nazi leaders ( "I still 
say [Adrien] Arcand is our man!"); called for Canadian police to 
discriminate against blacks ( "exactly when will white cops understand 
that they should stand by THEIR race?!"); and trashed a Jewish youth group 
( "if people spent the time building fellow WNs [White Nationalists] up 
rather than tearing them down we'd be dangerous. Unless your goal is to 
tear people down in which case go join Hillel or something.")

Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC

Ezra Levant, National Post  Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009

At least 12 CHRC prosecutions have been tainted by CHRC staff or witnesses 
using agent provocateur tactics like that. They've even written Nazi 
shorthand for "Heil Hitler".

Steacy testified that at least seven CHRC staff have access to Nazi 
membership accounts: Steacy himself, his two personal assistants, 
investigator Sandy Kozak, lawyer Giacomo Vigna, manager John Chamberlin, 
and former CHRC investigator and current serial witness and complainant 
Richard Warman.

By sheer numbers, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has more Nazi 
members than the tiny Canadian Nazi Party did when it briefly existed in 
the 1960s.

If real police and prosecutors behaved this way, they would be suspended 
and any criminal charges tainted by such misconduct would be stayed. Not 
so at the CHRC, which lacks an internal affairs office or written 
operational policies. It doesn't even have a code of ethics.

It's become so embarrassing that even the tribunal -- the kangaroo court 
that rubber-stamps CHRC censorship prosecutions -- has ended its silence. 
Four months ago, the tribunal examined some of these comments, including 
one denouncing Jewish politicians as "scum."

"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have 
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-Nazi] sites," wrote the 
tribunal. "It is possible that his activity in this regard could have 
precipitated further hate messages in response ... The evidence in this 
case of his participating on Internet sites similar to the Northern 
Alliance [neo-Nazi] site is both disappointing and disturbing."

It's a scandal that the CHRC joins Nazi groups on the taxpayers' dime. But 
instead of recognizing the problem and fixing it, Lynch is trying to cover 
it up.

The Prime Minister needs to intervene. It's time Stephen Harper fired 
everyone with a Nazi membership at the CHRC, along with the woman who is 
permitting their bigotry. - Ezra Levant blogs at ezralevant.com

Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:53:30 -0400
Subject: Fwd: *** RCMP release documents on the CHRC Criminal Hacking 
        Investigation ***
From: Paul Fromm <paul@paulfromm.com>

RCMP release documents on the CHRC Criminal Hacking Investigation 

Investigation dropped due to jurisdictional issues with the United States 

And the RCMP investigates Lemire for daring to complain 

http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/july18-09_rcmp_access_req.html

In late June, 2009, the RCMP responded to an Access to Information 
request filed by human rights activist Marc Lemire for all documents 
surrounding the criminal investigation of the Canadian Human Rights 
Commission and their theft of an innocent woman�s internet connection.

The evidence showing that the CHRC hacked into the internet connection 
of Nelly Hechme came to light as a result of evidence subpoenaed by 
Marc Lemire.  The evidence was sworn testimony by Alain Monfette from 
Bell Canada�s Law Enforcement Team and examination of CHRC employees 
during a May 2008 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing.

The heavily censored documents released by the RCMP show that the recent 
statements made by the Canadian Human Rights Commission�s Chief Commissioner 
Jennifer Lynch were inaccurate and misleading.   Lynch wrote in July 11, 
2009�s National Post that �Mr. Hiebert says there is uncontradicted expert 
evidence that a commission employee illegitimately used the Internet 
connection of a third party. Two independent investigations, one by the 
RCMP expert unit responsible for computer crimes, and one by the Privacy 
Commissioner of Canada, found no evidence to support this allegation.�

Highlights from RCMP Documents   

The RCMP found the case to be �Complete � Unsolved� 
The RCMP could not pursue the case because evidence trail lead to the
United States where RCMP has no authority and no MLAT existed to compel 
information 
After a message from CHRC�s lawyer Kathleen Fawcett, the RCMP turned around 
and investigated Lemire for daring to lay the complaint. RCMP censored what 
the message from CHRC said. 
As part of the CHRC rebuttal to the charges, they submitted their own copy 
of the March 2009 Transcript, which has been found to be highly questionable 
and �missing� key testimony. 
The RCMP found that the distance from the CHRC offices to the WiFi access 
point of Nelly Hechme was only a mere 400 meters (across an open field) 

The RCMP saw this investigation as highly political and had multiple printouts
from Ezra Levants website, articles from the National Post and other internet 
websites. 
Multiple CHRC employees were involved in case and �liaised� with the RCMP.  
This included the manager of the CHRC�s IT dept. 
The Ottawa Police reviewed the case, accepted it, and forwarded it to the
RCMP, 
who had more expertise in federal matters.
All RCMP Documents 

Detailed analysis of the RCMP documents

This is the general summary of the RCMP�s investigation of the Canadian 
Human Rights Commission.

Notice the �Clearance status� shows the investigation by the RCMP as 
�Complete � unsolved�

In the summary, the RCMP notes that �Matter was investigated by OPS 
[Ottawa Police Service] but follow-up is now done by A Div ITCU 
[Integrated Technical Crime Unit � RCMP].�  This shows that the 
Ottawa Police Service investigated the case, accepted it, and 
sent it onto the Integrated Technical Crime Unit of the RCMP 
because it involved a Federal Government Agency.

At the Ottawa Police Service, the complaint was investigated by Martin
Dompierre. Detective/Forensic Examiner. Criminal Investigative Services. High
Tech Crime Unit. Ottawa Police Service.

The summary continues: �Investigation completed as of 2008-11-10 reveals not 
enough evidence to pursue charges.�  
As described in more detail below, the RCMP were not able to use sworn legal 
affidavits provided by the owner of Stormfront, because the affidavit was not 
collected pursuant to a Canada / USA �MLAT�, which is a Mutual Legal
Assistance 
in Criminal Matters Treaty.

�MLAT� agreements with the USA are generally only implemented for serious 
criminal matters, such as murder, child exploitation or kidnapping, because 
it involves getting many different agencies involved, including provincial 
Attorney Generals.

During the course of the investigation, the officer met with RCMP lawyer 
Christine Morris of IPOC (Integrated Proceeds of Crime division - RCMP) 
who specializes in multi-jurisdictional investigations.  Any MLAT request 
by the police have to be reviewed and vetted by an IPOC counsel, who then 
submits it to IAG (International Assistance Group - part of the Department 
of Justice Criminal Law Branch)    [See Department of Justice - The Federal 
Prosecution Service Handbook at 
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/pub/fps-sfp/fpd/ch43.html#43_6_3 ] 

While the specific recommendations of Morris were censored, it would seem to 
be that, as a result of that meeting, the affidavit and other sworn legal 
information provided from the United States were not allowed to be used as 
evidence in the criminal investigation of the CHRC.


In a RCMP�s �Briefing Note:  Theft of telecommunications � CHRC,� the RCMP 
officer wrote that:  �The information obtained from Marc Lemire were obtained 
without legal authorization and involved the USA country.  To use the
evidence, 
it would require that an MLAT be obtained and executed.�

Thus without that information about the IP address CHRC investigator Dean
Steacy
(Internet codename: JADEWARR) used when he accessed the Stormfront website as 
�Jadewarr�, there was a limited chance of the likelihood of a successful
prosecution.
   

RCMP investigate Marc Lemire for daring to complain about CHRC 

One of the most shocking revelations to come out of the RCMP documents is that
the RCMP actually investigated Marc Lemire for daring to lay the criminal
complaint against the CHRC!


Only a few weeks before the RCMP was going to close the case, they received 
�a message from Kathleen FAWCETT, lawyer at the CHRXCH� [Canadian Human Rights
Commission].  The contents of the message sent by the CHRC�s lawyer were 
censored from the report, but the RCMP immediately turned around and 
investigated Lemire.  

The report stated �writer [RCMP Sgt. Stephane Turgeon] requested the
assistance 
of DCAU for a background check of COM LEMIRE, Marc.�  The �DCAU� is the RCMP�s
�DIVISION CRIMINAL ANALYTICAL UNIT.�, which performs CPIC checks on Canadians.

CPIC is an acronym for the Canadian Police Information Centre.  
The RCMP administers this database and says that CPIC �is a computerized
system 
that provides tactical information about crimes and criminals.�   
This is the most highly secure police database in Canada and holds private 
details on some 10 million Canadians. 

The CPIC computer has four data banks: Investigative, Identification, 
Intelligence and Ancillary.  Contained in those four data banks are:  

Vehicles: License information, including validation tags, stolen, abandoned 
or wanted in connection to a crime. 
Persons: Persons wanted by the police or accused persons; persons on probation
or parole; persons against whom prohibition orders have been placed (e.g.
driving, possession of firearms); missing persons, including children; body
marks/scars; 
clothing and dental records or body parts that can be cross-referenced;
amnesia,
comatose or disaster victims. 
Property: Stolen guns, articles and securities. 
Marine: Stolen and abandoned boats and boat motors. 
Dental Characteristics: Individual dental records (a sub-system of Persons
File)
Canada Firearms Registry: Every Canadian owning a firearm or having a license.
Cross-referenced with every gun serial number to registered owner  (this alone
contains over 10 million records) 
Criminal Records:  Full criminal record information. 
Criminal Record Synopsis: Condensed version of criminal records supported by 
fingerprints maintained by the RCMP�s Information and Identification Services.
CPIC Surveillance: Contains criminal intelligence information and information 
on persons, vehicles and boats which are under surveillance. 
So, what lies did the CHRC spin for the RCMP to do an about-face and parse 
through Marc Lemire�s most intimate details, which could include information 
from his dental records to marks/scars to his vehicle information? 

Unfortunately, the RCMP completely censored what the CHRC�s lawyer said, but 
based on the CHRC past paranoid ranting on �security,� it is easy to make an 
educated guess.

Through out the entire human rights hearing against Marc Lemire, the CHRC 
constantly used the sphere of alleged �security threats� to stifle the defence
that Lemire was putting up.   In order to keep the lid on the CHRC spying 
operations, they even tried to have Lemire banned from his own hearing, using 
the fraudulent accusations of �security threats.� [CHRT ruling � Para 15-17]

CHRC lawyers � spinning tales of threats and imaginary security breaches �
used 
this tactic as a way to block hundreds of questions by invoking �national
security� 
and Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act, which stopped dead all answers to 
questions.   Looking back now, it is clear that the CHRC invoked Section 37 to
cover up their abuse and misdeeds.  It had nothing to due with security at
all.
For instance, the CHRC invoked Section 37 to stop all questions about the
�Jadewarr� account, which was used by CHRC employees to infiltrate websites
and
post messages.  
The CHRC screamed security!  Security! Security! over any questions about
�Jadewarr�.  Now that the answers have been revealed, the utter abuses of
�security� claims are 
clear and documented.

The CHRC have used false claims of �security� so often � to hide everything
they
were doing � even the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal became disgusted by their
abusive behavior. 

In 2008, the Tribunal chastised the CHRC for their numerous groundless claims
of
�security.�   The Tribunal ruled that:

�[9] The outcome of the [Marc Lemire�s Federal Court Appeal to] s. 37 matter 
gives me pause to question the soundness of the Commission's invocation of 
public security concerns with respect to the testimony of these witnesses.�

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is shameless and has proven in the past, 
they are willing to do and say anything to protect their censorship franchise.
Is it really hard to believe that the CHRC would call up the RCMP and spin
some 
imaginary tale of terror, in order to throw the RCMP off their dirty corrupt
scent?  
Or perhaps the CHRC could just sign onto to one of the many websites they have
memberships on and post a �violent threat� themselves, then use it as
justification 
to get Lemire.  It all might sound pretty conspiratorial... BUT the CHRC does
have 
a proven track record of calling up police agencies and having them
investigate 
people who dare to file complaints against them or their friends.

Perhaps the CHRC was trying to stop the 9 months straight of negative
publicity 
they were receiving as a result of being under the cloud of a criminal
investigation?  
By having the RCMP do the dirty, and investigate every detail of Lemire�s life
in 
hopes that they might find something.  After all, it would have been a great
coup 
de grace to have Lemire charged with some criminal offence in the end.  
Then Jennifer Lynch and her cronies could do their usual finger wagging
diversion 
and point to Lemire and say, �see he�s the criminal.... not us!�

On an interesting side note, if Lemire was a criminal or corrupt, he would
easily 
be able to get a nice cushy job at the CHRC in the future� After all, the CHRC
and 
ethics don�t mix.

For background information on the hacking allegations made against the CHRC
and
the criminal complaint filed with the RCMP, please see:  

March 26/08: CHRC Operatives Hack Unsecured Wireless Access point to Post Hate
Messages! 
March 26/08: Lid Blown Off Commission Internet Spying in Lemire Case 
May 17/08: UPDATE: on Criminal Complaint against Canadian Human Rights
Commission 
for Stealing innocent woman's internet connection 
April 18/08: Privacy Act complaint filed against Canadian �Human Rights�
Commission 
for unauthorized use of an Internet connection 
April 10/08: Motion for Disclosure of CHRC fake names and to reopen hearing
over
CHRC WiFi Hacking 
June 6/08: CHRC Transcript Irregularities   [See YouTube video here] 
Nov 21/08: Criminal Complaint against CHRC: Evidence leads to the USA, where
the
RCMP can�t follow up.  RCMP won't investigate further 
Jan 30/09: Privacy Commissioner rules on CHRC WiFi Hacking Allegations after a
shockingly poor investigation 
  
Link:  http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/july18-09_rcmp_access_req.html

 
It appears that CHRC has more NAZI members than did the
Canadian Nazi Party when it existed briefly in the 1960's.

The Prime Minister of Canada needs to act - NOW.
Fire all the nazi criminals involved at CHRC,
and prosecute them criminally - before Remembrance Day.
Otherwise, for what did all the millions die, fighting the nazis?

Perhaps the Israel Mossad should take care of these nazis, permanently,
as they did with the Munich terrorists, Eichmann et al?

Since Israelis are now searching the world for body parts, perhaps they
could pick up Richard Warman and his nazi colleagues and use them for
body parts/organ harvesting? If parts are not good enough, then they
can always use for medical experiments...
Warman and his gang of nazis must have some usable body parts,
for the body-snatchers.


Now that Marc Lemire has kicked the CHRC in the balls, 
with the admission by CHRC that some of its' rulings are 
illegal and contravene the Charter of Rights & Freedoms,
what will Warman then do for a living - wash dishes?

And, now that an Appeal is filed against CHRC & Warman 
regarding some ill-gotten money from another victim, will
Warman finally be charged and convicted for his criminal acts?

Even good jews such as the renowned jurist Alan Borovoy have criticised 
the illegal activities of Warman, which brought anti-zionist reactions -
all just vecause of the criminal acts of Warman, proven by Lemire !

For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com

Other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE - www.zundelsite.org
IHR - www.ihr.org
Stormfront - http://www.stormfront.org

KenMcVay@vex.net
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg

Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
office: VISIT at:
#5 - 1601 - Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 - 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
or call: 1-250-616-9431

Feel free to subscribe McVay to mail lists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.

Grosvenor may be gone, but others are now taking up his campaigns.