Thread View: can.gov.general
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by nobody
Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:00
NIZKOR BANKRUPT - TAX FRAUD??
Author: nobody
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 00:00
185 lines
7943 bytes
7943 bytes
From: Werner Knoll <wernerkn@telus.net> Newsgroups: de.soc.politik.misc Subject: Re: Nizkor bankrott ! Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 09:13:05 -0700 Hans Bolte wrote: > Horst Kleinsorg wrote: > Hallo Horst, > > Man wundert sich. Unsere Berufs-"Holocaust"-Kaempfer > > Langowski, Kolthoff, Chatwin usw. sind ploetzlich alle > > verschwunden in der NG. > > Kann Nizkor nicht mehr zahlen weil Nizkor bankrott ist? > > Was man nicht fuer Geld alles so tut, nicht wahr? > Eine dumme Frage: Was ist "Nizkor"? > Hans Ich konnte niemals verstehen das solche schlaue Menschen wie die Juden eine Person wie McVay f|r sich verwenden. Der Mann hat |berhaupt kein Verstdndnis wie man mit Menschen umgeht. Ich habe hier die Antwort von Cecelia Plechinger auf McVays seine Frechheiten. *********************************************************** Subject: Ken McVay speaks for only *some* of us Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 22:02:34 GMT From: cplechinger@my-dejanews.com Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion Newsgroups: can.politics,van.general,can.general,bc.general In article <6js9fq$stf$1@news.trends.ca>, kmcvay@nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote: > In article <3560D751.3ED4D12C@istar.ca>, Werner Knoll <werk@istar.ca>wrote: > >Kenneth McVay OBC wrote: > [Werner says Cecilia says] "*Says* Cecilia says"???? I'm Cecelia and I actually did post this to soc.culture.jewish awhile back. And Ken, it is spelled "Cecelia" not "Cecilia." You and I go back to 1991, before you founded Nizkor, Ken. You should know how to properly spell my name. And I am part of the history of Nizkor, Ken, yet you pretend to have just barely heard of me. [...] My approach is far different than yours. I seek to understand and elucidate while you seek to punish and reek revenge. I seek to prevent future Revisionism before it starts by elucidating *why* people become Revs in the first place and providing viable alternatives to satisfy the same needs such people seek and find in Revisionism. You, by contrast, seek to hunt them down, "expose" them, discredit them and equate each and every one of them with hard-core Jew-haters. I seek to humanize whilst you seek to dehumanize them. [...] (According to you, each and every person who becomes a Rev does so out of evil motives, specifically, Jew-hating motives -- but I posited motives like trying to find relief from a Shoah that is too hard to bear and further posited that Germans both American-born and European-born are at much greater risk to become Rev's due to a need to seek shelter from the guilt -- guilt which is big enought as it is, but gets amplified further by anti-German bigots. THIS vital info YOU did not want to HEAR.) If I had offered to name you names of all the in-the-closet Revs I knew and to give you private personal information on the publicly-Revisionist people I know (I mean information they would want kept private), maybe then you would have seen me as a valuable resource, Ken. But this too is not my style. I would relate other Revisionist's experiences to you but with all identifying information expunged. You did not like that Ken. Names, addresses, employers you would have wanted. Traumatic anti-German childhood and young adult experiences you did not want. [...] So, you unilaterally decided that my massive, but "normal" information on Butz was not worth knowing and not worth passing on to scholars researching Holocaust denial. But, I suppose, in addtion to thinking you speak for each and every participant of <can.politics, van.general,can.general, and bc.general> (such as by posting "Knoll speaks for none of us" with the "us" meaning all the participants of the said NGs), you think can speak for Lipstadt and also but make her decisions for her. Too bad. So I had little value to you, Ken. Too bad. What I know, in the right hands, is invaluable for the very same "combat the Holocaust deniers" work you so sincerely and diligently devote yourself to. But you methodology is so different from mine that I even had to put your phrase "combat the Holocaust deniers" in quote marks because it is so different from what I feel when I think of reducing the phenonomon of Holocaust denial. I do not want to "combat" Holocaust deniers who are sincere disbelievers of the Shoah. I just want to provide viable alternatives and to combat the *causes* of people seeking solace or an outlet in Revisionism. Thanks to people like you, Ken, there is at this time a dire poverty of viable alternatives to Revisionism. Thanks to you and your ilk, people like me and Werner Knoll are faced with two extremes -- yours (which actually deserves the label "Holocaust Lobby") and radical Revisionism's. At the very same time you and your ilk seek to suppress the truth about why we turn to Rev, some of those who run radical Revisionism (Carto, Mark Weber, Hans Schmidt) understand *very well* the needs of people like me, Werner Knoll, hundreds of thousands of American and Canadian Germans to include Ernst Zu"ndel. And they meet our needs and lure us into Revisionism (Zu"ndel was so lured in Toronto years ago) with these met needs. Once there, an effort is on to lure us into hard-core Jew-hating circles (they so lured Zu"ndel). With me, all the further they got me was Revisionism. The "Holocaust Lobby" then did much to drive me towards hard-core Nazism. It is only to my credit I did not go. Don't say if I resisted anybody could. I am made of some pretty tough stuff. If most people, including Ken, were subjected to what "the Holocaust Lobby" subjected me to since 1990 when I first "came out," they would be neo-Nazis. Like I said, this included Ken. I will not say all the things they put me through here. Maybe I will publicly say it another time or in another venue and maybe I will not. With Werner, I cannot tell from just the few posts I read if he had been lured as far as actually into Revisionism or not. But I can see that he is "at risk." But Ken, with your posts, you are increasing the risk. "At risk" does not mean "evil" either, Ken. Do not blame the victims. We too are victims and survivors of the Shoah. And I myself am also a victim from a Jewish point of view, Ken. But you were so busy trashing me the ways the Germans part of my heritage made me 'at risk' that you never even let me tell you I am also Jewish and very much like a Hidden Child first generation Jewish Shoah survivor and very much like a Second Generation Jewish Shoah survivor. It is your own prejudice which did not let you see THESE traits in me, Ken. That plus the fact you are a Goy. The JEWISH rage in me never spoken about a huge portion of my people cut off, my JEWISH mourning, you never heard. Had I gotten a different e-mail account and showed you the Jewish rage and mourning within me, you would have liked that other persona, huh, Ken. *********************************************************** Werner Knoll
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads