Thread View: can.gov.general
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Anonymous User
Sun, 06 Feb 2000 00:00
ZHIDS=KIDDIE PORN; Now Same Law for Whites?
Author: Anonymous User
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 00:00
527 lines
22128 bytes
22128 bytes
From: "Boris" <boris@movil.com> Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish References: <199910230159.DAA17342@sol2.tvd.be> Subject: Re: ZYDS=KIDDIE PORN - Now Same Law for Whites? Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 20:44:24 -0700 nobody@club.worldonline.be> wrote in message news:199910230159.DAA17342@sol2.tvd.be... > The Edmonton Sun newspaper today reports on > another charge of KIDDIE PORN. > A Lawrence Mark Edelstein has been charged with > possession of child pornagraphy. Sentence on > conviction carries a penalty of up to 5 years' prison. > Perhaps his defence will include the news items below? > Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:47:17 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mixmaster <mixmaster@remail.obscura.com> > Subject: JEWS=KIDDIE PORN, Now same Law for Others? > All across Canada, lawyers and their clients can now > use the case of the JEW SYNAGOGUE CANTOR > CONVICTED OF DISTRIBUTING KIDDIE PORN from > his synagogue, as a legal precedent. > For example, there is the Vancouver case of Robin Sharpe, > who won his appeal for possession of kiddie porn this week. > It seems the precedent of the JEW CANTOR, who got off > when convicted of DISTRIBUTING KIDDIE PORN, will be > a precedent for others now?? > Then there is the case of the ex-Edmonton cop, Dale Weir, > also being appealed. > The 2 above are charged or/and convicted of > POSSESSION of kiddie porn. > Then there was the other case of the DND scientist > Blair Evans, in Ottawa,who got 8 months in prison!!! > All these cases, and others can ask in their appeals: > IF A JEW IS CONVICTED OF DISTRIBUTING KIDDIE PORN, > BUT DOES NO TIME IN PRISON, SURELY NON-JEWS > SHOULD GET SIMILAR TREATMENT ??? > On Mon, 08 Feb 1999 14:56:33 GMT, kengaygoy@scheisse.zhids.org wrote: > >On Sat, 06 Feb 1999 16:11:27 GMT, scheisslauri@pamyat.nozhid.org > >wrote: > >>On Sat, 06 Feb 1999 10:20:59 -0500, Al Marchant > >><dreamingdog@sympatico.ca> wrote: > >>>Oh that's a very simple question to answer. > >>>It's because they are better than you dummy. > >>In other words, you agree that the JEW KIDDIE PORN people > >>get preferential treatment from the crooked Courts in Canada?? > >>Why should the Christkillers be treated differently than white men?? > >>>scheisslauri@pamyat.nozhid.org wrote: > >>>> It seems that if you are a JEW distributing KIDDIE PORN in > >>>> Canada, you do not have to go to jail!!! > >>>> In fact, you are allowed to leave Canada, even though normal > >>>> people in Canada have to go to jail, as they should. > >>>> Why should JEWS not have to go to jail for distributing KIDDIE > >>>> PORN?? > >>>> On Tue, 02 Feb 1999 16:05:26 GMT, scheisslauri@pamyat.nozhid,org > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >On Thu, 25 Sep 1997 01:55:53 -0500, jacob bekker > <jbekker@flash.net> > >>>> >wrote: > >>>> >If that was "A Polish school teacher at a Halifax church..." > >>>> >than it was O.K. > >>>> >J.B. > >>>> >>No, it would not be OK, no matter who is the pervert. > >>>> >>What is of concern, is whether the 3 NON-JEWS presently charged > >>>> >>with similar crimes, will now also be allowed to leave Canada, > >>>> >>without having to spend the normal 5 years in prison? > >>>> >>Or, is this generosity only available to damn JEW KIDDIE PORN > >>>> >>DISTRIBUTORS, especially if they are connected to a synagogue?? > >>>> >> ><odessa88@direct.ca> wrote: > >>>> >>> ARREST SHOCKS SYNAGOGUE; TEACHER FLIES BACK TO U.S. > >>>> >>> By EVA HOARE and AMY PUGSLEY FRASER Staff Reporters > >>>> >>> A Hebrew school teacher and cantor at a Halifax synagogue, > >>>> >>> who downloaded hundreds of pornographic photographs of > >>>> >>> children from the Internet, was fined $2,200 in court > Tuesday. > >>>> >>> The fine was paid and Stuart David Friedman, a > >>>> >>> well-liked and respected member of the Beth Israel > Synagogue, > >>>> >>> promptly left the country for his native United States. > >>>> >>> It's the first charge of its kind in Nova Scotia and > justice officials > >>>> >>> hinted that Mr. Friedman's activities - downloading a > personal > >>>> >>> fantasy collection of boys performing sexual and > >>>> >>> sadomasochistic acts - could be > >>>> >>> connected to an international child pornography ring. > >>>> >>> Mr. Friedman, 42, of South Park Street, Halifax, pleaded > >>>> >>> guilty to possessing child pornography from the Internet. > >>>> >>> When Canada Customs and police officers arrested him > >>>> >>> during a raid on his apartment Monday, the cantor was > >>>> >>> surfing the Net. Although his private cache contained > >>>> >>> photographs and videos - as well as gay and bondage > >>>> >>> magazines - the bulk of his collection was 223 > >>>> >>> computer-generated photos of child pornography stored on > >>>> >>> diskettes, on two computer hard drives, and on computer > printouts. > > >>>> >>> ``It's extremely disgusting,'' said Const. Gary Martin of > >>>> >>> the HalifaxRegional Police Service, whose officers also > >>>> >>> conducted a search of Chebucto Freenet offices, > >>>> >>> Mr. Friedman's Internet provider. ``Ninety per cent of this > >>>> >>> material was obtained either directly or indirectly through > >>>> >>> the Internet. > >>>> >>> Some ... was directly downloaded from the Internet and > >>>> >>> some was obtained from different groups that are within > >>>> >>> the Internet,'' Const. Martin said. > >>>> >>> ``The pictures are very explicit. It covers just about > every > >>>> >>> avenue of pornography that's out there.'' > > >>>> >>> Canada Customs' intelligence division started working > >>>> >>> the case last September and then brought in regional > >>>> >>> police, said Ed Osborne, customs' > >>>> >>> regional intelligence officer. > > >>>> >>> Now officers - who'll spend hundreds of hours poring > >>>> >>> over the materials - want to know if any Nova Scotian > >>>> >>> children were depicted in the ``gruesome'' > >>>> >>> photos and material seized. But they do not expect > >>>> >>> that will be the case. > > >>>> >>> Parents of children who attended the Hebrew school, > >>>> >>> shocked by the arrest, planned to meet Tuesday night. > >>>> >>> ``As aware as people are that these things > >>>> >>> can and do happen, it's still a shock,'' said Cathy Fox, > >>>> >>> president of the Beth Israel Synagogue. Her three children - > >>>> >>> two sons and a daughter - were taught by Mr. Friedman > >>>> >>> at the synagogue's Hebrew school. ``It's a very > >>>> >>> difficult time.'' > > >>>> >>> The cantor - who leads the congregation in song - > >>>> >>> taught her 13- year-old son songs and chants > >>>> >>> that were part of his bar mitzvah ceremony last > >>>> >>> October, Mrs. Fox said. > > >>>> >>> Some members will feel betrayed as a result of > >>>> >>> the charges. ``I think the elderly members of our > >>>> >>> congregation will be very hurt by this.'' Some are > >>>> >>> appalled while others expressed sympathy. > >>>> >>> ``I'm very saddened,'' said Robert Wolman, > >>>> >>> president of the synagogue's board of governors. > > >>>> >>> Mr. Wolman said he and other board members > >>>> >>> heard about the case Monday night and > >>>> >>> Mr. Friedman was immediately dismissed. > > >>>> >>> Wearing an olive-colored trenchcoat and a black > >>>> >>> yarmulke (skull cap) over his greying hair, > >>>> >>> a pale and visibly nervous Mr. Friedman was > >>>> >>> ushered into provincial court by two sheriff's deputies. > >>>> >>> Refusing even to look up at the judge, he stared > >>>> >>> resolutely at the floor while wringing his hands. > > >>>> >>> ``This is the first (such) charge through our office,'' > >>>> >>> Crown attorney Frank Hoskins told Judge Hughes Randall. > >>>> >>> ``But it sends a message out to the public that if you're > in > >>>> >>> possession of these images from your Internet and > >>>> >>> they're child pornography, you can be charged with > >>>> >>> a criminal offence and get a criminal record > >>>> >>> and a substantial fine,'' Mr. Hoskins said later. > > >>>> >>> Article Segment 2 of 2 > >>>> >>> <A > HREF="http://xp5.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?recnum=%3c199701162146.NAA0852 > 2@mailmasher.com%3e%231/2&server=db96q5&CONTEXT=874940586.1932133778&h > itnum=192">(Ge > >>>> >>>>> <A > HREF="http://xp5.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?recnum=%3c199701162146.NAA0852 > 2@mailmasher.com%3e&server=db96q5&CONTEXT=874940586.1932133778&hitnum= > 192">(Get All > > >>>> >>> Canada Customs received information about a > >>>> >>> child pornography ring in Canada and the > >>>> >>> United States operating via the Internet, surface > >>>> >>> mail and electronic (e-mail), the Crown attorney said. > > >>>> >>> Officers said Mr. Friedman's apartment was > >>>> >>> ``ill-kept and unclean,'' and that they also found letters > >>>> >>> with explicit sexual content. A second search > >>>> >>> conducted at Chebucto Freenet yielded his e-mail records. > > >>>> >>> Mr. Hoskins and defence lawyer Joel Pink said > >>>> >>> Mr. Friedman, who co-operated with police, > >>>> >>> was only using the material for his own > >>>> >>> sexual fantasies. ``His intent was possession, > >>>> >>> not distribution or selling,'' said the Crown. > > >>>> >>> The former cantor - who is not married - has > >>>> >>> provided information that will help police bring > >>>> >>> more ``like-minded individuals'' to justice, > >>>> >>> Mr. Hoskins said. > > >>>> >>> Outside court, police Sgt. Bill Cowper, the > >>>> >>> department's Internet specialist, said this > >>>> >>> is just the beginning. ``We're pursuing every > >>>> >>> angle at this time. He's not the only person. ... > >>>> >>> The investigation does involve law enforcement > >>>> >>> officials in Canada and in the United States.'' > > >>>> >>> Police said Mr. Friedman is being investigated > >>>> >>> over the alleged distribution of photos to other > >>>> >>> Internet users. Police won't say which American > >>>> >>> agencies are involved and the U.S. Customs > >>>> >>> Service, reached late Tuesday, declined comment. > > >>>> >>> Mr. Hoskins asked that Mr. Friedman surrender > >>>> >>> his computers, valued at $1,200 and $1,500 apiece, > >>>> >>> to the court in addition to the $2,200 fine > >>>> >>> ($2,000 plus a $200 victim surcharge). > >>>> >>> Two sets of handcuffs were also confiscated. > > >>>> >>> After the court appearance, Mr. Friedman took > >>>> >>> the 4:45 p.m. flight to Boston to be with his family. > > >>>> >>> Officials won't comment on the amount of the fine - > >>>> >>> the offence carries a maximum of five years in > >>>> >>> prison - saying that's up to the judge. But they > >>>> >>> did say there was a plea bargain. > > >>>> In other words, one law for normal people caught under > >>>> this crime, and if you are a JEW, you get off?? > > >>>> >>> Mr. Friedman, holder of a music degree from an > >>>> >>> American university, arrived in Halifax in August 1994 > >>>> >>> and has worked at Beth Israel ever since. His last > >>>> >>> posting as a cantor was in the Detroit area. > >>>> >>> The man, whose job was to lead prayers, > >>>> >>> teach Hebrew school and help prepare boys for > >>>> >>> bar mitzvah, has no prior criminal record, Mr. Pink said. > > >>>> >>> ``My eldest son has a great deal of respect for the > >>>> >>> cantor,'' said Mrs. Fox, who wanted to break the > >>>> >>> news to her children before they heard it through > >>>> >>> the media. > > >>>> >>> ``We have to do this in a very nonalarmist fashion ... > >>>> >>> I'm still thinking about how we will handle this.'' > > >>>> >>> Mr. Wolman said the board of governors would > >>>> >>> review of the matter as soon as possible and > >>>> >>> plans to tighten the screening process for > >>>> >>> future cantors. > > >>>> >>> Police also said they found a stash of adult > >>>> >>> pornography - 31 nude orpartially-nude self-portraits - > >>>> >>> but the charges stem from the child-related > >>>> >>> material. > > >>>> >>> With staff reporters Bruce Erskine and Barry Dorey > >>>> >>> The Halifax Herald Limited, 1997. > > >>>> >>>>> Join NSWPP mailing-list, go to: > >>>> >>>>> http://www.nswpp.org/">http://www.nswpp.org > > > > >>>On 1 Jul 1998 18:48:11 GMT, billy_bob@throckmorton.com (Billy Bob > >>>Throckmorton) wrote: > >>>>In article <jeff_brown-0107980822210001@38.27.217.200>, > >>>>jeff_brown@bigfoot.com says... > > >>>>>In article <6nbkoj$60u@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com>, Scott "beat you > to a > >>>>>bloody pulp" Bradbury, hiding behind his "Billy Bob Throckmorton" > sock > >>>>>puppet, wrote: > > >>>>>>Gort McFee commented: > >>>>>>>>>Gee, I don't see Ken defending homosexuality there, > >>>>>>>>>Doc-Scott. He seems to be defending tolerance. > >>>>>>>>>Is that what has your knickers in a knot? > > >>>>>>What does the word "homophobe" make reference to then? > > >>>>>It makes reference to a person who fears homosexuals -- you, for > instance. > > >>>>>Where in the passage cited, O Gutless One, does Ken McVay > >>>>>make any reference to homosexual sex? And if he doesn't refer > >>>>>to it, how, exactly,can he be defending it? > >>>>>We're _still_ waiting for the answers to those questions... > > >>>>He does not have to mention homosexual sex in order to > >>>>defend it. I never said that he mentioned homosexual sex. > >>>>This is your ruse to divert attention that Gay McVay > >>>>urges tolerance toward a "community" that engages > >>>>in such practices. If you want tolerance for a group > >>>>of people that practice such then you would also > >>>> tolerate their acts would you not? If it weren't for > >>>>their practices then the subject of tolerance wouldn't > >>>>be an issue would it? > >>>>What is so hard about this concept? > > >>>>It is about the same as people that say they are pro-choice; > >>>>they avoid saying they are pro-abortion but they approve > >>>>of the practice. You liberals are the ones that like to play > >>>>tricks with meanings of words. I have no doubt in my > >>>> mind that you, McVay and the rest of your ilk approve of the > >>>>homosexual community and their activity! Care to deny this now? > > >>>>>> [...deletia...] > > >>>>Quit deleting the original text if you wish to make argument. > >>>>Here is McVay unedited: > >>>>http://x12.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=365864512 > >>>>Subject: Dear Nizkor.... > >>>>From: kmcvay@nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) > >>>>Date: 1998/06/25 > > >>>>[Notice that the Nizkooks in their apologia for homosexual > >>>>acts seek to make homos into heroes! Notice also they > >>>>totally deleted Goldberg's original questions as well. > >>>>Here is the link to Goldberg's post that all these > >>>>homo-aphologist seek to avoid: > >>>>http://x9.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=365721680 > >>>>7/1/98 Tavish] > > >>>>In article <3593c583.138589250@news.abccom.bc.ca>, > >>>>Electric Zen <electriczen@nospam.bigfoot.com> wrote: > > >>>>[deranged bonehead displays homophobia, Ken Lewis responds] > > >>>>Notice how another 'revisionist', unable to support his > >>>>arguments with facts, resorts to teenaged sexual comments. > >>>> Were all of you maroons > >>>>cloned from the same defective brain cell? > > >>>>That would certainly explain why they don't have more > >>>>than a single functioning neuron between them, would it not? > > >>>>This discussion reminds me - Saturday, June 28, is Pride Day. > >>>>There will be a massive parade in Toronto and other cities. > >>>>Folks who would like to stand up and be counted for > >>>>tolerance should attend. Last year, > >>>>about a million spectators lined the Toronto route. > > >>>>(The Phelps Clan should probably stay home - they > >>>>don't know the meaning of tolerance.) > > >>>>A sobering reminder: During the past ten years, one > >>>>half of Canada's arts community has died of AIDS. > >>>> Half - Dancers, actors, artists of all sorts. > >>>>Such a loss cannot help but have a devastating > >>>>impact upon our cultural life, and homophobic > >>>>cheap shots don't remove this very sad reality. > > >>>>"Revisionist" my Aunt Tildy. These twits wouldn't know > >>>>a revisionist if he bit them in their nether regions. > > >>>>The Nizkor Project-----------------------http://www.nizkor.org > >>>>Ken McVay, Director. http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay > >>>> ----------END---------- > > > >>>>I answered the stupid questions above the requoting of > >>>>Ken McVay's obvious apologia for homosexuals and the > >>>>acts that get them termed as homosexuals. > > >>>>>>How is AIDS spread and why did McVay use the word "homophobe?" > > >>>>It has been explained repeatedly and the lurkers have > >>>>gotten the point. It is you that seeks to do damage > >>>>control and diversion. Won't work! > > >>>>>> [...deletia...] > > > >>>>Where was it ever claimed that Ken McVay mentioned > >>>>homosexual sex? I made no such claim. It is you making > >>>>the claim that I made the claim! > >>>>I have maintained that he makes apologia for a "community" > >>>>that obviously engages in such acts. They aren't called > >>>>homosexuals for any other reason Georg and you > >>>> look extremely agenda concious and stupid to keep up > >>>>this current ruse! > > >>>>>> [...deletia...] > > >>>>>>>>If Gay McVay > >>>>>>>>believes so much in tolerance then why doesn't he > >>>>>>>>appreciate the right to free speech and stop showing > >>>>>>>>intolerance toward others. > >>>>>>>>Ernst Zundel for instance. > > >>>>>>>When and where, exactly, has Ken McVay stated > >>>>>>>that Ernst Zundel should > >>>>>>>not have the right of free speech? > > >>>>>>His group snipes at Zundel and others like him all the time. > > >>>>>When and where, exactly, has Ken McVay stated > >>>>>that Ernst Zundel should not > >>>>>have the right of free speech? > > >>>>Any attention paid to McVay's activities and his > >>>>allegiance to B'Nai B'rith will show how he aggresively > >>>>seeks to silence the opposition using what he > >>>>calls "hate speech" laws existent in Canada. > > >>>>Just use the following key words at DejaNews: > >>>>ZUNDEL McVAY FREE SPEECH and you will see much! > >>>>or do a search on GROSVENOR McVAY FREE SPEECH > >>>>and you will find such gems as: > > >>>>http://x10.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=315519835 > >>>>Subject: Re: Free Speech > >>>>From: kmcvay@nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) > >>>>Date: 1998/01/13 > >>>> > >>>>In article <34bab636.2890382@news.interlog.com>, > >>>>Sheila Paterson <shepat@//REMOVETHIS//interlog.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>[snip] > > >>>>>Everyone has the right to free speech no matter how > >>>>>obnoxious,offensive, fascist or boring. > >>>>>What one doesn't have is the right to > >>>>>keep someone from speaking. > > >>>>Although many here would argue the point, the > >>>>statements above are notcorrect for Canada, > >>>>which does not have the protection of the American > >>>>First Amendment. > > >>>>In short, in accordance with recent Supreme Court > >>>>of Canada findings, there are acceptable abridgments > >>>>to Canadian Charter rights to free speech. > > >>>><<SNIPPING>> > > >>>> -----END OF ARTICLE------ > > >>>>http://x7.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=342508652 > >>>>http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=340569637 > >>>>Subject: Supreme Court upholds defamatory libel law > >>>>From: kmcvay@nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) > > >>>>>>You just don't pay attention. They want Zundel in prison for > mere words! > > >>>>>Note that Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie is repeating his non-answer. > > >>>>>When and where has Nizkor stated they 'want Zundel in prison', > >>>>>O Gutless One? > > >>>>http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=157567242 > >>>>Subject: Ernst Zundel, threat to Canada's national security? > >>>>From: kmcvay@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC) > > >>>>>McVay on CBC: > >>>>>"I did at that time approve [of] Canadian actions against > >>>>>Zundel against Keegstra, ah it was sort of a gut reaction > >>>>>because they offended me so deeply I said good shut > >>>>> them up put them in jail do what ever it takes, > >>>>>...no free speech." > > >>>>Care to deny the above now Georg? DejaNews is filled with such! > >>>>I'll bet that you really approve of Socialist Canada's "free > speech" > >>>>too. > >>>> Billy Bob > >>>>>JGB > > >>One must wonder, did faggot Oyvay get fired from the > >>US military for being a child molester? > > >>Is that why nazikor so strongly defended the Synagogue > >>Cantor in Halifax, convicted of distributing KIDDIE PORN? > > >>Is Oyvay also under investigation by Interpol, > >>for being involved in kiddie porn?? > Reposted by:KenGayGoy@zhid.fags.R.us.88 > Telephone nights to discuss: 408-773-0984, > or Yale at: 610-435-9820
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads