Article View: can.gov
Article #43Re: Canadian Tax Test Results :CRA SOTW
From: Alan Baggett
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:21
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:21
173 lines
9107 bytes
9107 bytes
On Jan 6, 9:37 am, "Canuck57" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > "Peeassha" <peaash...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:gjvp5v$r2c$1@reader.motzarella.org... > > > > > > > > > "Alan Baggett" <AlanBagg...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message > >news:18b6bc34-ae6a-4714-b185-2cbd7e2e9c8f@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > > Canadian Tax Test Results :CRA SOTW > > > Failing grade on the Canadian Tax Test > > > Average taxpayer scored only three out of 10 when asked about common > > personal taxation rules, but the company that conducted the survey > > says that is because of the complex changes made to the system > > recently > > > SARAH DOUGHERTY, Freelance > > > When it comes to knowing about tax rules that could save them money, > > Canadians aren't making the grade. > > > That's the conclusion of the Great Canadian Tax Test, a recent survey > > commissioned by mutual fund company Mackenzie Financial. The average > > Canadian got only three of 10 answers right on the survey of common > > personal taxation rules. > > > But the failing grade doesn't mean Canadians aren't knowledgeable, > > said Mackenzie spokesperson Sandy Cardy. Rather, the results signal > > just how difficult it is to keep up with a changing and complicated > > tax code. > > > "Even a genius can't keep up with the number of changes," says > > Mackenzie Financial's Sandy Cardy. > > > "I think Canadians are becoming increasingly sophisticated and tax > > savvy, but they can't keep up with the changes," said Cardy, senior > > vice-president of tax and estate planning for Mackenzie. "The results > > show even a genius can't keep up with the number of changes and the > > complexity." > > > This was the second tax test conducted by Mackenzie, whose core > > business is mutual fund management. The company also offers wealth > > management services. > > > Mackenzie runs the tax test as part of the education it provides for > > both independent financial advisers and those that sell its products, > > according to Cardy. > > > On the last test two years ago, the average Canadian turned in a > > better performance, correctly answering six out of 10 true-or-false > > questions. > > > Cardy chalked up the score slippage in the test done this fall to the > > introduction of a number of tax changes in 2007. These include the > > right to contribute to an RRSP up to age 71 instead of 69 and the > > abolition of an annual contribution limit for RESPs. > > > Other questions on the test dealt with income splitting, the carry > > back of net capital losses, gifts of publicly listed stock, tax > > credits for children involved in qualified physical activities and > > capital gains on non-registered investments. > > > Cardy declined to speculate why there were regional variations in the > > scores - Quebecers scored the lowest, Manitobans and Saskatchewan > > residents the highest - other than pointing out one of the questions > > dealt with a rule not applicable in Quebec. (The other rules in the > > test apply across the country.) > > > Cardy thinks it's more difficult than ever for individuals to do their > > own tax planning. "A few decades ago, it was easier to go it alone and > > maximize your credits and deductions," she said. > > > In recent years, governments have responded to lobby groups by > > adopting a slew of new rules, according to Cardy. Seniors, for > > example, are benefiting from new income splitting provisions. Income > > splitting allows one partner in a couple to allocate income to the > > other partner to reduce taxes. > > > Canadians are pretty knowledgeable about RRSPs, said Cardy, but tend > > to miss out on credits and deductions, income splitting possibilities > > and education planning strategies. > > > Plain old procrastination accounts for part of Canadians' failure to > > be more proactive about tax planning, Cardy said. Information overload > > is also part of the problem; between the Internet, self-help books and > > business news on television, taxpayers are swamped with advice. > > > Personal finance Average taxpayer scored only three out of 10 when > > asked about common personal taxation rules, but the company that > > conducted the survey says that is because of the complex changes made > > to the system recently > > > Cardy's bit of advice is to hire a financial adviser, who can act as a > > quarterback, bringing in other experts (for example, insurance > > specialists and estate lawyers) as needed. > > > Patricia Lovett-Reid agrees complexity is one reason Canadians neglect > > tax planning. She also thinks lack of time is a big factor. Lovett- > > Reid is a senior vice-president with financial services firm TD > > Waterhouse Canada Inc., a business television host and certified > > financial planner. > > > "Tax planning is about doing a lot of little things right," Lovett- > > Reid said in a phone interview from her Toronto office. > > > "When people are looking to put more money in their pocket, they think > > about spending less," she said. "Tax planning falls to the bottom of > > the list." > > > When Lovett-Reid hits the road to talk about tax planning and > > investment strategies, she sums up the priorities with a series of > > tips. Here is her list: > > > - Split income with family members. > > - Maximize contributions to your RRSP and any RESPs for a child's > > education. > > - Borrow to invest. > > - Where possible, buy and hold investments to defer taxes. > > - Invest in a home instead of making someone else rich by renting. > > - Use dividend-paying investments, which are tax advantaged. > > - Maximize tax deductions and employee benefits. The latter might > > include preferential mortgage rates and reimbursement for travel and > > meals. > > - If you can earn self-employment income, it opens up doors to lots of > > deductions. > > > Aside from working with a financial planner, Lovett-Reid recommends a > > book published annually by the tax and advisory firm KPMG called Tax > > Planning for You and Your Family, which is available in book stores. > > > Canadians might not see the immediate, tangible benefits of hiring a > > professional to help with tax planning, but the investment pays off in > > spades, Cardy said. "If they were to take advantage of all (the > > rules), it would have a dramatic influence on their future net worth." > > > © The Gazette (Montreal) 2007 > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot! > > Pop the link below into your browser to view the entire CRA SOTW > > Library! > >http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Alan Baggett - Tax Collector's Bible > > > You can't split income with family members unless they're 18 or older or > > the attribution rule will apply. > > I thought you had to be retired? > > Be interested to hear how a wage earner can split earned income with his > wife. As far as I know, can't be done.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Where the article states: ' - Split income with family members.' It was assumed that they were speaking of non-employment income. i.e. if a husband and wife have a joint savings account that earns interest income, they could attribute that income in a manner that benefits the pair best.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2dfed512-d0b7-4d29-9923-f9ce39a241b9@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<18b6bc34-ae6a-4714-b185-2cbd7e2e9c8f@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <gjvp5v$r2c$1@reader.motzarella.org> <d1K8l.41419$mE3.32531@newsfe14.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fa8a0,bfcdbb59577e37de
X-Google-Thread: f64a0,bfcdbb59577e37de
X-Google-Thread: f504b,bfcdbb59577e37de
X-Google-Thread: 111a4f,bfcdbb59577e37de
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa8a0,gidf64a0,gidf504b,gid111a4f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Alan Baggett <canadarevenue.agency@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: can.gov,can.taxes,can.general,ott.general
Subject: Re: Canadian Tax Test Results :CRA SOTW
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 173
Message-ID: <2dfed512-d0b7-4d29-9923-f9ce39a241b9@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <18b6bc34-ae6a-4714-b185-2cbd7e2e9c8f@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
<gjvp5v$r2c$1@reader.motzarella.org> <d1K8l.41419$mE3.32531@newsfe14.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.29.166.82
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231266074 25678 127.0.0.1 (6 Jan 2009 18:21:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.29.166.82;
posting-account=_ubRvgoAAACBmxJr1F8clI0ZzsETR0hJ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98;
{8B658961-1F12-11D9-A524-444553540000}),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)