Re: CIPS is *not* for its members - Article 11 - go-pugleaf

Article View: can.org.cips

Article #11

Re: CIPS is not for its members

#11

From: Tom Ruta
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:00

20 lines
1364 bytes

C & L Whitfield <mlw@soonet.ca> wrote:

>Tom - With respect I have just finished incorporating an NFP and we were
>told by the lawyers
>
>a) In Ontario NFP's CAN"T have proxies
>and
>b) If they were allowed it would have to be specifically stated in the By
>Laws including some guidance on "who" could handle the proxy and "how" it
>would be available to the Chair for use in determining a vote outcome.
...

I thank you for your answer.  Although I wonder if the
Ontario law is applicable to CIPS - a nationally
incorporated body. 

And back to the appearances thing, why couldn't National (or
Ken C. or Kewal) have come out earlier with such an answer?

Tom

Technical Details

Message-ID: <36d04e04.228213@news.supernews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <19990221.124824.19781@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f56b1,821b2b6eb82cbad9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public
From: rutat@cadvision.com (Tom Ruta)
Subject: Re: CIPS is *not* for its members
Date: 1999/02/21
Message-ID: <36d04e04.228213@news.supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 446773938
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <19990221.124824.19781@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com
X-Trace: 919620695 YAEMDGF8R4489CFE4 usenet46.supernews.com
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: rutat@cadvision.com
Newsgroups: can.org.cips

Reply to Parent Message