Article View: can.org.cips
Article #130Re: Ottawa SGM
From: C & L Whitfield
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:00
45 lines
2748 bytes
2748 bytes
[As proof that it is time to move on on this subject I inadvertently sent this note which was intended as a CIPS-L note as a reply to a personal communication so I am going ahead and resending the substance to the list] > >.... all CIPS members who monitor this list. > >I supect that the absence of the normal level of traffic on the list is a signal to me and others that (for many different reasons) people are ready (maybe way past ready) to move on and give this issue a rest and that is what I intend to do. Unless my determination fails me this will be my last posting on this list on this subject. > >I leave with these comments excerpted from other conversations in other forums. > > I believe,..., that the SGM should be taken as a "new beginning" -- not as an end. I am pleased with the thrust of the message received from Kewal that was sent to individual members. I really hope that the board can convey a genuine regret that this whole situation occurred and send a genuine message of reconciliation to those who feel "rejected"or "disenfranchised" by the vote .. in my view [there] needs to be a focussed and concentrated effort to go after each & every one of those members and deal with them as individuals.(There is a major role for the Regional directors >here and I think it comes with the territory of them having accepted this >role). I believe that each one [of those who feel CIPS have let them down] has their own issues and concerns and any attempt to lump into a category will fail. Even an effort like the one I suggest may have a low success rate but I believe it is essential that it be done. > >... for me the real test of CIPS is what happens over the next 12 months and [answering the question whether] the board [has] learned anything from this -- despite the support in the vote will they accept that they are 100% accountable [for the situation] and will they take genuine, positive action to make the changes that would prevent this from ever happening again? > >I am willing to communicate "off-line" in direct exchanges with anyone who feels so inclined but as mentioned I think it is time for CIPS-L to "give it a rest" > >Best regards - Charlie Whitfield >> >> <snipped>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19990329.100024.25296@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,d01ab8e4dbd499fc X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: C & L Whitfield <mlw@soonet.ca> Subject: Re: Ottawa SGM Date: 1999/03/29 Message-ID: <19990329.100024.25296@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 460348869 Sender: daemon@unb.ca Organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA X-Sender: mlw@soonet.ca Reply-To: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@LISTSERV.UNB.CA> Newsgroups: can.org.cips