🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 18:42:45 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
...
>At the SGM, the only matter that can be considered is the one that the
>SGM was organized for. Thus, if at the SGM, the motion to reinstate
>failed, the National Board would not have been able to appoint a new
>Vice President until the -next- Board Meeting after the SGM. [I'm afraid
>I don't follow the situation closely enough to know when that next
>meeting would normally be.] As such it wouldn't be "one more month",
>it would have been "one more month" plus the time until the following
>meeting.
>

They could have held the board mtg. right after the decision
if they thought they'd win.  Now they'll have rescind <g>.

>Still, I don't consider it to be very tactful to make the appointment
>at this time.

Seems to be par for the course.

Tom