🚀 go-pugleaf

Bill,

Your opinion of what is fact and what isn't may not be shared by all.
With all due respect to you and whatever your motive is here, as soon as
you refer to statements made by someone on the Board or the Exec as
though it were fact, your arguments are wasted. There have been too many
misrepresentations coming from the Exec, in particular, for me to take
their 'word' as 'fact.'

And unfortunately just because you make a statement and label it a
'fact' does not make it so...

Andrew P.


Bill Ross wrote:
>
> I do, and I stated in them the letter posted on CIPS-L.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Ross
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Ross/CTAL/CTC on 02/26/99 10:06 AM
> ---------------------------
>
> Andrew Patterson <apatterson@accesscable.net> on 02/26/99 12:06:19 AM
>
> Please respond to CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@LISTSERV.UNB.CA>
>
> To:   CIPS-L@LISTSERV.UNB.CA
> cc:    (bcc: Bill Ross/CTAL/CTC)
> Subject:  Re: Fwd: Board incumbents letter (was: Resent mail....)
>
> Bill Ross wrote:
> >
> > Gerry:
> >
> > I'm truly sorry you feel the way you do, but unfounded, emotional rants
> are
> > not going to improve anything; and unless you have facts to back up your
> > comments about the national board I suggest that you keep the innuendo
> and
> > insults to yourself.
> Bill,
> I'm truly sorry you feel the way you do, but unfounded, emotional rants
> are
> not going to improve anything; and unless you have facts to back up your
> comments about Steve Gallinger I suggest that you keep the innuendo and
> insults to yourself.
> Andrew P.