Article View: can.org.cips
Article #1960Re: Read if CIPS-L Spam bugs you (was "The Apology plus my
From: Jim Cornell
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00
62 lines
3024 bytes
3024 bytes
Steve and CIPS-Netters, My feedback... >List Function Options discussed >************************************** >1) Continue wide open list > >3) Make subscription to the list restricted to only CIPS members >and selected external subscribers but allow postings from all >(ie. only we receive what's posted but the world may post to >our list). > >4) Make subscription restricted and only allow postings from within >the list > >5) Keep subscription open + point 3 above >6) Keep subscription open + point 4 above > I favour the second option (seriously, the one marked #3 <g>). But continuing wide open as today would also be OK (#1). > >Issues to discuss; >********************* > >1) Should we have our Co-ordinatrix be responsible for >violation monitoring, contacting offender & pointing out problem >with a suggestion re: appropriate response, etc. as she did >in this recent case? BTW, well done Michele. We wouldn't >all have to spend much think time on it when scanning >our CIPS-L mail (ie. just delete as soon as you realize what it >is and let Michele deal with it). Yes - and it will be a relief to have it well-handled, offline, without so much of our reading time messed up with hearing people's responses to the original spam! - ps - and I agree that Michele did a fine job with the Edmonton job agency posting. > >2) In response to my publish-a-FAQ suggestion,it was suggested >that a posting was unneccessary as the users of this list should >already know the netiquette rule of 'read awhile before you post' >and hence would know what was 'acceptable use'. We would >be preaching to the converted. > Disagree - we all start off as new. It would be particularly useful to send 'netiquette' suggestions out with the original (automated) subscription response. And publishing a reminder on a periodic basis (every one or two months) would not be so bad. Particularly, if its marked as a 'reposting' when its an unchanged message, then the more experienced netters can easily bypass it and consign it to the bit bucket in the sky. ____________________________________________________ Jim Cornell, I.S.P. cornellj@cuug.ab.ca President Treasurer, CIPS Calgary I T Interactions Ltd. Phone: (403) 259-3508 Calgary, AB, Canada T2V 2N7 Fax: (403) 258-1192 =====================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19960412.134750.10948@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,1c374ad6cd3a802a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: Jim Cornell <cornellj@CUUG.AB.CA> Subject: Re: Read if CIPS-L Spam bugs you (was "The Apology plus my Date: 1996/04/12 Message-ID: <19960412.134750.10948@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 147284972 sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca x-sender: cornellj@cuugnet.cuug.ab.ca organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA reply-to: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@unb.ca> newsgroups: can.org.cips originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca