🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: can.org.cips
Article #1960

Re: Read if CIPS-L Spam bugs you (was "The Apology plus my

#1960
From: Jim Cornell
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00
62 lines
3024 bytes
Steve and CIPS-Netters,
My feedback...


>List Function Options discussed
>**************************************
>1) Continue wide open list
>
>3) Make subscription to the list restricted to only CIPS members
>and selected external subscribers but allow postings from all
>(ie. only we receive what's posted but the world may post to
>our list).
>
>4) Make subscription restricted and only allow postings from within
>the list
>
>5) Keep subscription open + point 3 above
>6) Keep subscription open + point 4 above
>

I favour the second option (seriously, the one marked #3 <g>).
But continuing wide open as today would also be OK (#1).

>
>Issues to discuss;
>*********************
>
>1) Should we have our Co-ordinatrix be responsible for
>violation monitoring, contacting offender & pointing out problem
>with a suggestion re: appropriate response, etc. as she did
>in this recent case? BTW, well done Michele. We wouldn't
>all have to spend much think time on it when scanning
>our CIPS-L mail (ie. just delete as soon as you realize what it
>is and let Michele deal with it).

Yes - and it will be a relief to have it well-handled, offline, without so
much of our reading time messed up with hearing people's responses to the
original spam!
 - ps - and I agree that Michele did a fine job with the Edmonton job agency
posting.

>
>2) In response to my publish-a-FAQ suggestion,it was suggested
>that a posting was unneccessary as the users of this list should
>already know the netiquette rule of 'read awhile before you post'
>and hence would know what was 'acceptable use'. We would
>be preaching to the converted.
>
Disagree - we all start off as new. It would be particularly useful to send
'netiquette' suggestions out with the original (automated) subscription
response.

And publishing a reminder on a periodic basis (every one or two months)
would not be so bad. Particularly, if its marked as a 'reposting' when its
an unchanged message, then the more experienced netters can easily bypass it
and consign it to the bit bucket in the sky.
____________________________________________________
Jim Cornell, I.S.P.             cornellj@cuug.ab.ca
President                       Treasurer, CIPS Calgary
I T Interactions Ltd.           Phone: (403) 259-3508
Calgary, AB, Canada  T2V 2N7    Fax:   (403) 258-1192
=====================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19960412.134750.10948@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f56b1,1c374ad6cd3a802a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public
From: Jim Cornell <cornellj@CUUG.AB.CA>
Subject: Re: Read if CIPS-L Spam bugs you (was "The Apology plus my
Date: 1996/04/12
Message-ID: <19960412.134750.10948@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 147284972
sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca
x-sender: cornellj@cuugnet.cuug.ab.ca
organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA
reply-to: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@unb.ca>
newsgroups: can.org.cips
originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca