Article View: can.org.cips
Article #1993CIPS President Responds - Article #3
From: Kevin Brown
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 00:00
38 lines
3134 bytes
3134 bytes
The Interview: Article 3 Feedback from CEOs In the Computing Canada interview I also discussed the need to take the message of professionalism and professional certification to employers. The primary reason for this was that the common response from practitioners as to why they have not applied for the I.S.P. designation is "why should I be certified when employers don't think it is important." I shared with Martin the statistics quoted in the article. I'm sure that I can find many other sources to back up the high degree of systems project failures. The discussion then turned to my meetings with senior officers of Canadian companies and government departments. In almost every case, these senior executives shared their concerns about their increasing dependence on their IT departments and the broader IT industry (hardware and software vendors, consulting and contracting firms, and outsourcing organizations) for their company's future success. Their key concern almost always focussed on the poor track record of the IT industry when it came to systems delivery. The IT industry was often criticized for over commiting and under delivering. It was as this point in the interview that I noted that one senior executive referred to the IT industry as a "bunch of shysters." I must admit that while I didn't think this comment would end up in print, at least it was one description of our industry that was printable. Believe me, some senior executives were less generous to our industry. Clearly, this reference caused some concern and caused a few individuals to respond that I was not doing the industry a service. For those that thought the description was too harsh, just put yourself in the CEO's position in front of a board of directors, having to explain why a major systems initiative was late, over budget, or had to be cancelled. The board of directors are not going to be comforted by excuses that the users didn't know their requirements, or that the head of the IT department didn't feel supported, or that the project was late because users kept changing their requirements. The CEO expects the head of IT to know the business, understand how to apply information technologies to the business, and to be able to manage the complexities of system projects. Whether we are talking about the CIO, a project manager, a systems analyst, a hardware or software vendor, an IT consultant or an IT contractor; each one should be accountable for their individual contribution. Kevin Brown, I.S.P. President, Canadian Information Processing Society
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19960420.201356.24567@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,388389fd5e93c94a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: Kevin Brown <kbrown@TIGGER.EON.NET> Subject: CIPS President Responds - Article #3 Date: 1996/04/20 Message-ID: <19960420.201356.24567@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 150694741 sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca organization: Alberta Research Council reply-to: kbrown@edpower.com newsgroups: can.org.cips originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca