Article View: can.org.cips
Article #2076Re: testing3...et al
From: Rick Taylor
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00
52 lines
2642 bytes
2642 bytes
>Hi Steve! > >Thanks for Officially talking to Mr.P's Office on behalf of the CIPS list. > ><snip> >>I left this info with a colleague of Mr. P's at his office. Hopefully he >>will respond to us ASAP. I'll keep you informed. >> > >>He's a net-newbie so perhaps we should give him a break but I personally >>don't think so. >> >I do not think that he should be given any slack in this situation. To >para-phrase Tom's comments if he doesn't know how to use the tool he should >spend the time to learn it first . > >>FYI, CIPSnet is in the process of formulating a set of rules for posting jobs. >>In the meantime we are allowing limited use of CIPS-L for ads from members >>only for jobs within their organizations (ie. not by search firms, >>sub-contracting agencies, etc.). >> >>I've personally taken some heat from agencies about this policy so I'd like >some >>fine opining........get ready here comes the questions. >> >>a) Should CIPS-L allow job-ad's? >>b) If yes, are there any specific types to be included/excluded? >>c) What should we do when our 'acceptable-use' is violated? > >To put in my two cents worth (I think that makes about $1.83 now) >a) Sure if there is a "specific" IS professional position being recruited >for I have no problem with that. For example the recent ad from Ontario (I >think) were they were looking to fill a specific IS position. > >b) Exclude self serving fishing trips like from Mr. P's cheesy recruiting >firm. This list was not intended to promote organizations or individuals. >Heck, I won't even attach my signature file to a CIPS-L posting because it >contains my company name. > >c) I'm open to suggestions for this point. Personally I don't have the time >to send a polite little note to every cretin who couldn't be bothered to >learn proper manners before they try and use a forum. >Although I DO have time to call an 800 number and voice my displeasure. > >Respectfully, > >Ron Baugh, ISP > >Hi Steve: I agree that we should allow specific ads relating to job postings in the computer industry only.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19960318.160615.20244@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,7d7d77f499ab2b29 X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: Rick Taylor <rtaylor@OANET.COM> Subject: Re: testing3...et al Date: 1996/03/18 Message-ID: <19960318.160615.20244@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 143326378 sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca x-sender: rtaylor@pop.oanet.com organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA reply-to: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@unb.ca> newsgroups: can.org.cips originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca