Article View: can.org.cips
Article #2112Re: ISP ?
From: Mike Fletcher
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00
61 lines
3463 bytes
3463 bytes
In his response to Don Duncan, Marty R. Milette wrote: >My biggest gripe about the ISP process is that it completely ignores >those of us who've been working in the industry for years but didn't >>have the luxury of a College or University education. Many of us are >self-trained and/or have taken highly-specialized courses appropriate >to our field of work. > >Until some means of recognizing ones efforts outside the academic >world exist, the ISP designation will mean little more than the >University or College certificate behind it. <snip> As you have already been informed in several replies, CIPS and the I.S.P. certification process do indeed recognize a professional experience only qualification for certification (12 yrs & in the field before '76). While I don't personally agree with the before '76 requirement (ABAT ... Another Battle, Another Time), I do believe the 12 yrs experience is fair. The reason is that one's base level of knowledge of concepts, discipline, methods, etc. is very difficult to determine objectiveley when it is based on OJT, tightly focussed or vendor specific training or some of the many other educational vehicles available today. > ... our >most important skills for the next decade will be to LEARN, RELEARN and >UNLEARN. <snipping again> This fact is very strongly recognized (as has been mentioned in at least one other response) in the recertification requirement for continuing education (300 hours over three years on a rolling average basis). >By the way, I know what the 'canned' response will be, "take the ICCP >exams and we'll recognize you". My response is simply that why should I >have to spend hundreds of dollars and days of time to write >introductory-level exams for things that I've been trained, tested and >certified to do and have been doing for years, simply because CIPS >doesn't recognize the organization that trained me. Why? Because it provides a very clear and objective yard stick of that base level of knowledge I was talking about earlier. In fact, it is quite common in many professional designations to require all prospective candidates to write 'entrance exams' on their respective bodies of knowledger before they are formally considered for certification, regardless of educational credentials (some even before qualifying work experience can be gained). This is, in fact, something I hope that the Certification Council considers to 'raise the bar' for qualification once CIPS has established its own exam. ... "The opinions expressed in forgoing ramblings are the opinions of the author only and should in no way be construed as the opinions of management." ... :) Regards Fletch ================================================================= Mike Fletcher, CISA, I.S.P. (fletcherm@cuug.ab.ca) Secretary, CIPS Calgary Director, Membership / Registration, CIPS Alberta
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19951215.144937.24172@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,73cd57e6755fd253 X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: Mike Fletcher <fletchem@CUUG.AB.CA> Subject: Re: ISP ? Date: 1995/12/15 Message-ID: <19951215.144937.24172@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 122018000 sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca x-sender: fletchem@cuugnet.cuug.ab.ca organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA reply-to: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@unb.ca> newsgroups: can.org.cips originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca