Article View: can.org.cips
Article #2134Re: Free Sex etc... how
From: Adrian Powell
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:00
51 lines
2996 bytes
2996 bytes
>There is a small amount of confusion because you're intermangling >email and Usenet news specific details. My mistake--I only get these messages through the mailing list--CIPS-L. I had forgotten that this was also a newsgroup. >>This can be done by running a mail daemon that rewrites headers, or does >>not conform to RFC standards. Most people won't go to this trouble, >>though, especially since the PATH will often prove this out. > >I think you really meant to say "by running a mail program or Usenet >news program that allows you to change headers, and the transport >software doesn't check, or the recipient isn't smart enough to be able >to tell". We can do that as well (I blush if I forgot this option). I was thinking of several "stunned" mail daemons that I've come across (*cough* *cough* configured *cough* *cough*) that had an annoying habbit of stripping headers, regardless of whether they were RFC required or not (anyone played with MS Mail Gateways?). This option that you mention is going to become a very large issue in the future, with the explosion of the Web and browsers such as Netsape that support email. There is no concept of 'user', and email addresses appear as what you specify. I've recently been involved in some confusion with the University where we've had "official" notices coming from "yourid.here@pop.srv.ualberta.ca". At this point, it becomes difficult to reliably trace messages back to specific users. >used. The Internet is not trustable. So, don't base important decisions >on it without additional certainties. Do not be so quick to judge by True. I would treat the Internet similar to newspapers--they are always inheriently suspect. Some papers are more reliable than others, just as some newsgroups/mailing lists are more reliable than others. Some are just garbage. Before trusting anything you read, test it for yourself, or wait for what you perceive to be an educated critique of the comment. Of everything on the Internet, I think that this is the single greatest benefit: you can read very interesting articles, and their critiques with the same level of authority. I've found that this can lead to much more informed and mature decisions. Adrian. -- Adrian Powell (Adrian.Powell@NorwestLabs.com) home: http://ugweb.cs.ualberta.ca/~adrian phone: (403) 438-5522 fax: (403) 434-8586
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19951222.152209.25372@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f56b1,a70780c56a76d421 X-Google-Attributes: gidf56b1,public From: Adrian Powell <Adrian.Powell@NORWESTLABS.COM> Subject: Re: Free Sex etc... how Date: 1995/12/22 Message-ID: <19951222.152209.25372@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> X-Deja-AN: 122569313 sender: owner-cips-l@UNB.ca x-sender: adrian@corp02-crick organization: UofNB News Gateway, Fredericton, CANADA reply-to: CIPS General Discussion List <CIPS-L@unb.ca> newsgroups: can.org.cips originator: daemon@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca