🚀 go-pugleaf

Trevor Wilson wrote:
> "John-Melb" <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1169020290.111590.122130@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >> >> **This is fantastic news. The Kennesaw powers-that-be have discovered
> >> >> a
> >> >> heretofore unknown secret. Oh, wait: What are the figures for, oh,
> >> >> say,
> >> >> burglary?
> >> >>
> >> >> The law was passed in 1982.
> >> >> Year:    Burglaries:
> >> >> 1976    41
> >> >> 1977    21
> >> >> 1978    22
> >> >> 1979    35
> >> >> 1980    35
> >> >> 1981    54
> >> >> 1982    35
> >> >> 1983    35
> >> >> 1984    29
> >> >> 1985    32
> >> >> 1986    70
> >> >>
> >> >> Mmmmm. Those laws are working real well.
> >
> > I asked Trevor
> >> > We're assuming you have a reference to support your figures Trevor?
> >
> > To which Trevor replied
> >> ** www.fbi.gov
> >
> > Trevor, you are a fucking liar, the FBI-UCR on the website go back to
> > 1995, you're claiming this site as reference for figures from 1977 -
> > 1986.
>
> **The FBI has the data. Just ask them. More seriously, though, why did you
> not ask the same of the idiot who promulgated the lies about Kennesaw? You
> ask me for data and I supply it. You don't ask others to validate their
> claims. Why is that?
>
> >
> > Try again you lying fucking moron!
>
> **Alright then, prove me wrong. Supply your alternate data.
>
>
> --
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

No Trevor, you claimed an article provided by another poster was
erroneous, and provided data to support that, when asked for a
reference to support your claim, you gave a web-site that did not
contain the iformation you claimed.

We have an article, claiming that Kennesaw's laws have seen a decrease
in criminal activity, we have your claim that this is erroneous, the
only reference you have provided to support your claims regarding the
original article was found to be false.

It's not my responsibility to prove you wrong, and I have no desire to
do that, It's your responsibility to back up your claims that the
original article was in error with facts.

The way you and Carl squirm when asked to provide a reference to
support your assertions, it's no wonder that the "Gun debate has
created more heat, than light"

Are you able to provide a factual reference to support your claim the
original article was in error or not?