🚀 go-pugleaf

"Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>  wrote :

> 
> "Ms My Rights" <spoofedatnospam@individual.yes> wrote in message 
> news:Xns9888890AC8A8EIndividualRightsOner@216.196.97.142...
>> "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>  wrote :
>>
>>>
>>><10x@telu�s.net> wrote in message
>>> news:e88mm250gf9pcrdaie1mm9oe4cm6vpgjiu@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:34:55 -0800, Bill Smith
>>>> <quandary@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 27 Nov 2006 09:15:40 -0800, "Random Chaotic"
>>>>><random_chaotic@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bill Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27 Nov 2006 08:31:46 -0800, "Random Chaotic"
>>>>>>> <random_chaotic@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Bill Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> As long as we treat illicit drugs as a law enforcement issue
>>>>>>> >> and not a
>>>>>>> >> medical problem, the violence associated with it will
>>>>>>> >> continue and no
>>>>>>> >> amount of gun control will have any effect, whatever. The
>>>>>>> >> contributing
>>>>>>> >> factors are, poverty, ignorance, and hopelessness, none of
>>>>>>> >> which are addressed by confiscating my target pistols.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Why the leap from gun registration to confiscation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I made no such assertion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"addressed by confiscating my target pistols."
>>>>>
>>>>>Please point out where I said registration of my target pistols
>>>>>will lead to their confiscation. You can't, I didn't say it, nor
>>>>>even imply it. I made no mention of registration at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>                                      Bill Smith
>>>>
>>>> You don't have to say it.
>>>> Registration has lead to confiscation in Australia, The United
>>>> Kingdom, and Canada to name a few.
>>>
>>> Very true. In such places, confiscation has followed registration
>>> as night follows day.
>>>
>>> In the U.S. some have been luckier so far, depending on where they
>>> live. But in my state "assault weapons" (essentially meaning any
>>> firearm politicians think too military-looking) previously
>>> perfectly legal are now banned from sale, and subject to
>>> confiscation from owners who previously bought them legally before
>>> the ban, under a confusing succession of revised and re-revised
>>> laws by lawmakers who don't really know what they're doing. And
>>> they're still trying to rewrite these abominable laws to make them
>>> tougher. 
>>>
>>> These leftist looneys just hate guns (apart from their own, in many
>>> cases). Criminals they don't particularly object to, and are very
>>> liberal in letting them escape punishment or, if incarcerated,
>>> getting them out of prison as early as possible.
>>
>> Yes, and the marxists are taking control of the country now.
> 
> You're not supposed to call them marxists anymore. They've been
> calling themselves "liberals," and as it becomes more obvious that
> that means the same thing they now increasingly avoid even being
> called that. What leftist-"liberal" doesn't shrink from that
> description? In the whole U.S. Congress, only Bernie Sanders admits
> to being a socialist. 
> 
> Neil

Some of them are getting more brazen about it in recent years and 
replying; "What's wrong with socialism?".

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the 
name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist 
program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever 
knowing how it happened." - Norman Thomas, Socialist Party presidential 
candidate 1936-1968, co-founder of the American Civil Liberties Union

 "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to 
Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small 
doses of Socialism UNTIL they awaken one day to find they HAVE 
COMMUNISM." - Nikita Kruschev, 1959

"There is no such thing as a liberal...There hasn't been for a long, 
long time. I never use the word and you shouldn't either - nobody 
should. 'Liberal' is what socialists call themselves when they don't 
want you to understand that they plan to take away your rights, your 
property, and eventually your life." -- Alexander Hope

"For it is very clear that in fundamental theory socialism and democracy 
are almost if not quite the one and the same. - Woodrow Wilson 





-- 
IF YOU'RE NOT VOTING FOR LIBERTARIANS, YOU'RE ONLY VOTING FOR YOUR 
RULERS! If the government wasn't allowed to initiate force, the vote 
wouldn't be that important. It's only important because they can.

Why is it that the liberals define things as slavery that aren�t 
slavery, like voluntary mutually consenting employer-employee 
relationships, while not defining things as slavery that are slavery, 
like taxation?