🚀 go-pugleaf

While peter@ontmoh.UUCP (Peter Renzland) makes many good points - albeit
a tab sarcastically - he also states:

> Lest anyone dismiss all of this as mere quibbling -- please consider that
> it is precisely the gratuitous efforts at censorship of open discussion of
> policy matters promoted by the uninformed and uninvolved and apathetic,
> that leaves the field open to the self-interested.

After this I just couldn't help myself.  I ran it through my FOG indexer
and got pea soup.  I have concluded that the field is really open to the
self-interested and the self-indulgent.