Article View: capdist.misc
Article #359Re: Daniel Norton's Capital District Pages Gone
From: Sandy Kear
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 00:00
57 lines
2749 bytes
2749 bytes
In article <i7aflrlecv.fsf@phoebe.math.albany.edu>, hammond@phoebe.albany.edu (William F. Hammond) wrote: > >Clarification sought: > >Is Daniel saying that DigiCom copied his pages in order to offer them >through its own web site as if created by DigiCom? They were an ~exact~ duplicate of the pages Dan Norton had up on his site. They even had a disclaimer at the bottom of the page stating that they were in no way affiliated with Dan Norton, which clearly indicates that they were well aware of his pages. (This has since been removed and they have added some changes since then) Since Dan Norton has been building those pages for over 2 years, and DigiCom has only registered their domain ~this~ year (March 20th, as a matter of fact), it's pretty clear which came first. The URL is: <http://ww.digicomis.com/resources/>. They do not appear to have access from their main site. It also appears that they have been gradually changing the code. > >Could it have been that DigiCom was attempting to mirror those pages >in order to reduce inter-provider network delays (which have at times >been severe)? No.way. They are claiming copyright for the design of the page now. It's quite clear that they do not acknowledge any contribution by Dan. > >If the latter, there should have been visible full attribution as to >source. The closest they came to that was a denial that they were affiliated with Dan in any way, which has since been removed. Nice people, huh? > >If an author does not want pages mirrored, one way to make this clear >is to insert an HTML comment at the top of each such page, e.g., IANAL, but my understanding is that it is still copyright infringement unless they have the ~WRITTEN~ permission of the originator of the material (otherwise it's a he said/she said situation). With websites, getting the "hits" on your site is a commodity, and mirroring a site without permission is stealing the value of the original site. If Dan persues this, he may be able to obtain a portion of monies Digicom collects through advertisements signed up in the Capital Region as a result of using his work (a royalty). At least they have good taste - Dan's site was THE best regional site in the state, IMHO. Sandy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5luttt$8im$1@lori.albany.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<i7aflrlecv.fsf@phoebe.math.albany.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110b47,3a8603339be8a29b X-Google-Attributes: gid110b47,public From: sandy@roundthebend.com (Sandy Kear) Subject: Re: Daniel Norton's Capital District Pages Gone Date: 1997/05/21 Message-ID: <5luttt$8im$1@lori.albany.net> X-Deja-AN: 242841752 References: <i7aflrlecv.fsf@phoebe.math.albany.edu> Organization: Round the Bend Productions Newsgroups: capdist.misc