🚀 go-pugleaf

danorton@albany.net (Daniel A. Norton) writes:

> In <30f8ada0.1837516@news.globalone.net>, xor@globalone.net (Joe
> Schwartz) wrote:
> >A couple weeks ago, Time Warner Cable reorganized their channel lineup and
> >added more channels.  Since then, I've noticed that the picture looks good
> >on the low-numbered channels, but it gets progressively worse for channels
> >in the 40s and 50s.  MTV is extremely grainy, for instance.  Does anyone
> >else have this problem?  I'd like to know how widespread this is before I
> >call to complain.
> 
> Do you have "Basic" service ($6/mo) or "Basic Standard" service
> ($23/mo)?  Basic service doesn't include channels above about 20 or so.
> If you have the more expensive service, call and complain regardless of
> how widespread it is: you're paying for it.

I have the Basic Standard service, plus the Superstations.  I'll definitely
complain, but I want to get an idea where the problem is.  I don't want to
bother with a home service call if the problem isn't on my end.

------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Joe Schwartz      | My bumper sticker on the Information Superhighway:
5 Broadway #407   |
Troy, NY 12180    | Harry Browne for President: The Third Candidate in 1996
xor@globalone.net | For information, read http://www.HarryBrowne96.org/