Article View: ch.network
Article #1347Re: Which ISDN protocol best for PPP ?
From: Marc Furrer
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00
25 lines
1342 bytes
1342 bytes
schaefer@vulcan.alphanet.ch (Marc SCHAEFER) writes: > > In article <01bc1c61$db605420$1f0286c1@p100>, > "Juerg Reimann" <juerg_reimann@ibee.com> writes: > > X.75 ist in Europa immer das beste Protokoll. Hat aber eigentlich auch > > nichts damit zu tun, ob Du nun PPP dar�ber laufen l�sst, oder was auch > > immer. > > But X.75 has flow-control and error correction; I was thinking that > maybe using it with PPP (which has already flow-control and error > correction in the HDLC protocol) is a bad idea. > Another solution is just to use async to sync PPP. The PPP is just encapsulated into HDLC frames. No flow control, nothing, ... . The easiest to config. Of course, you'll need an access server that support it. Marc. -- Marc Furrer + 41 21 692 22 13 (voice) CI-Groupe Reseau + 41 21 692 22 05 (fax) Universite de Lausanne http://www-reseau.unil.ch/~marc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<r1vpvxw255x.fsf@cisun32.unil.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5e4di6$uld$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f8cd8,601b888227089f4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8cd8,public From: Marc Furrer <Marc.Furrer@ci.unil.ch> Subject: Re: Which ISDN protocol best for PPP ? Date: 1997/02/19 Message-ID: <r1vpvxw255x.fsf@cisun32.unil.ch> X-Deja-AN: 219863670 Sender: marc@cisun32.unil.ch References: <5e4di6$uld$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch> Organization: UNIL-CI-Reseau Newsgroups: ch.network