Re: Which ISDN protocol best for PPP ?

Article View: ch.network

Article #1363

#1363

From: Marc SCHAEFER
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 00:00

11 lines
828 bytes

In article <AF3523AC9668166FB@mirage.space.techno.ch>,
	liyanage@access.ch (Marc Liyanage) writes:

> I would recommend using synchronous PPP (PPP over HDLC) as it hast
> the fewest percentage of protocol overhead... Possibly also lower latency
> time, but I'm not sure about that one.

*grin* hasn't PPP already a HDLC layer ?

Thank you for the detail, I will try.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5eou6f$1tv$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5e4di6$uld$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f8cd8,601b888227089f4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8cd8,public
From: schaefer@vulcan.alphanet.ch (Marc SCHAEFER)
Subject: Re: Which ISDN protocol best for PPP ?
Date: 1997/02/23
Message-ID: <5eou6f$1tv$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>
X-Deja-AN: 220827310
References: <5e4di6$uld$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>
Organization: ALPHANET NF - Research and information - Not for profit
Newsgroups: ch.network

Reply to Parent Message