Re: Bluewin Fails Again! Why? Who's better?

Article View: ch.network

Article #434

#434

From: Marc Luethi
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 00:00

21 lines
1085 bytes

Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer@alphanet.ch> wrote:

>EUnet, which is quite expensive but reliable too. Except if you
>have a problem, response are usually very slow.

EUnet Webshuttle is anything but expensive... 25.- a month and using
the very same reliable und IMHO *fast* infrastructure as EUnet, of
course.

Only disadvantage: no "local access from everwhere" *YET*.
But they're working on it.

Greets

Marc

-- 
luethim@webshuttle.ch                        
http://zebra.fh-weingarten.de/~luethi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <357d48e8.8362094@news.eunet.ch>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <357A7290.2D15C3B@bluewin.ch> <6le7s1$jp4$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f8cd8,5fc67fc74e6d497d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8cd8,public
From: luethim@webshuttle.ch (Marc Luethi)
Subject: Re: Bluewin Fails Again! Why? Who's better?
Date: 1998/06/08
Message-ID: <357d48e8.8362094@news.eunet.ch>
X-Deja-AN: 360785971
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <357A7290.2D15C3B@bluewin.ch> <6le7s1$jp4$1@vulcan.alphanet.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: luethim@webshuttle.ch
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: private home site
Newsgroups: ch.network

Reply to Parent Message