Article View: ch.test
Article #45M`I 5-Persec ution - bug ging an d counte r-surveillance
From: fmfimi
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:04
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:04
45 lines
3476 bytes
3476 bytes
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you ever look for the. bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if PO: >I thought that was. happening to me, I'd search the place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know. if anything was out of place. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would. call in one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves.. This PO:. >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional. detective agency in. London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used scanner devices which. go to over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby transmitter in that range, they. also checked the phones and found nothing... but if the tap was. at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything,. would they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs. to be found? You can assume that they've done this. sort of thing to other people in more "serious" cases, where they would know. the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance.. So they will have developed techniques and devices which are. not readily detectable either by visual inspection or by electronic means.. What those techniques might be, I couldn't guess. In this case, the existence of bugging devices was clear from. the beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with. what was said by the boy on the coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance. people to be called in, who they knew. would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility to the other things I would have to say. relating to the harassment. I did all the. things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In addition to calling. in professional help using electronic counter-surveillance,. I made a close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any points where audio or video. surveillance devices might have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal. surveillance "mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible. supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a. small video surveillance device would. be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a property. to fit such a. device. 3859
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qn0800010904544465@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out04b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.alt.netShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f85d0,2885b65aa0d81ffb,start X-Google-Thread: 10d959,2885b65aa0d81ffb,start X-Google-Thread: 107a10,2885b65aa0d81ffb,start X-Google-Thread: f4b73,2885b65aa0d81ffb,start X-Google-Thread: fa123,2885b65aa0d81ffb,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf85d0,gid10d959,gid107a10,gidf4b73,gidfa123,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out04b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.alt.net From: fmfimi@lycos.com Newsgroups: ch.test,ch.market.comp,ch.comp.os.ms-windows,ch.comp.os.linux,ch.comp.networks Subject: M`I 5-Persec ution - bug ging an d counte r-surveillance Followup-To: ch.test,ch.market.comp,ch.comp.os.ms-windows,ch.comp.os.linux,ch.comp.networks,uk.misc Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <qn0800010904544465@4ax.com>