Article View: chi.internet
Article #184Re: Network Solutions
From: Bruce Esquibel
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:03
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:03
33 lines
2579 bytes
2579 bytes
Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> wrote: > This leads to a somewhat unrelated question. Do you have to respond to > those ICANN requests? My registrars always send me these ICANN requests > to update info and since my data is up to date I simply ignore them. > Somehow though I suspect if someone wants to steal one of my domains > could my not logging in and saying everything is OK considered in > violation of something? I don't know for sure but when that ICANN verification came to be, it looked like a cheap fix for a minority problem. As far as I know, if you do ignore them, nothing really happens. Where the shoe falls is if the domain name gets involved with some kind of dispute for whatever reason. If the registration service can't cough up the verifications to ICANN, it's assumed the registration was fraudulent and away it goes. It was a band-aid solution to dealing with an amputation but was the only practical solution they could come up with. It basically verifies that there is a working email address associated with the domain name. Again, as far as I know, the actual information in the verification request does not have to be accurate, it just really needs to be acknowledged to be in compliance. I'm sure none of the registration services do anything if they are ignored but you are giving them a tool to give you a headache later if for some reason a dispute appears about your domain name. -bruce bje@ripco.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kceh3u$si8$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!s9ni92008pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.2b50d77c11dcb45b989a30@news.speakeasy.net> <kc96q8$ov6$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <MPG.2b539faf9a0e2ac4989a35@news.speakeasy.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,83896a24a0e09177
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.68.197.201 with SMTP id iw9mr9312005pbc.6.1357563838475;
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 05:03:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!s9ni92008pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: Network Solutions
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ripco Communications Inc.
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <kceh3u$si8$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
References: <MPG.2b50d77c11dcb45b989a30@news.speakeasy.net> <kc96q8$ov6$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <MPG.2b539faf9a0e2ac4989a35@news.speakeasy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ripco.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1357563838 29256 66.251.253.170 (7 Jan 2013 13:03:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))