🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <j9envk$6v0$1@reader1.panix.com>,
Cydrome Leader  <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote:
>> dye <dye@adsl-64-108-194-61.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> At the time, chicagonet.net didn't detect two 64k connections,
>>> so I got all the computers in the network 128K access for
>>> $15/month....a bit of an improvement over 40k "dialout"
>> 
>> Hmm, that doesn't sound right.
>> 
>> Maybe they didn't detect it but must of permitted it, the channel bonding
>> for ISDN was mostly an option to support, I don't think it was "on" by
>> default with most hardware.
>> 
>> Besides the profile to support the bonding, the stuff we used (livingston
>> and 3com) I think used a stock profile setting "Line-Limit=1" so if someone
>> borrowed someone elses login and tried to use it, both connections were
>> dropped.
>> 
>> I'm just saying, was probably more intentional than accidental.
>> 
>> Maybe they outsourced.
>
>I think I used chicagonet if it was the NT (really) based ISP that just 
>rented dialup pool connections from level3 or something like that.
>
>lots of those places really didn't know if you had both channels up. It 
>took RCN years to notice I (and everybody) was doing that.

They had two different price plans, so not intentional.  I seem to 
remember my one data line being "dialed out" most of the time.
Since it was a "Band A" call, it was 5 cents, untimed.

--Ken

-- 
Ken R. Dye                               an optimist is a guy             |
Chicago, Illinois                        that has never had               |
http://dye.datsun510.com/index1.html     much experience                  |
dye1146 at g mail dot com                                    archy        |