Article View: chi.internet
Article #412Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
From: Geoff Gass
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 23:55
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 23:55
49 lines
3403 bytes
3403 bytes
Eric <ericw2000@gmail.com> wrote: > Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote in > news:slrnjrsv34.gkq.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com: > >> smr <me@shawnritchie.com> wrote: >>> On 5/24/2012 12:19 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>> dye<dye11@adsl-64-108-195-217.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Recently, I had my DSL Elite bill go up to 43 dollars, and in calls >>>>> to customer billing and finally customer retention, both of them >>>>> tried to get me to switch to Uverse, which surprised me since >>>>> Uverse isn't in Park Ridge (TV Uverse, at least - WOW and Comcrap >>>>> are the only companies w/the franchise in PR.) . . . >>>> >>>>> I forgot to ask him if my voice sevice would be analog over the >>>>> single pair, or converted to VOIP on the modem. >>>> >>>> I got forcibly converted to Uverse from DSL, which I didn't want. >>>> Like you, I'm in a "fake" Uverse area. >>>> >>>> I still have my analog telephone line. >>>> >>>> A friend just had Uverse installed. His neighborhood has real >>>> Uverse; I've seen the VRADs. However, he just got data (they >>>> wouldn't give him old-fashioned DSL). He kept his analog telephone >>>> line, too. >>>> >>>> So, for the moment, subscribers aren't yet forced to convert to >>>> Uverse VoIP. >>>> >>>> When I had DSL, it was billed to my home phone bill. Uverse is >>>> billed separately. >>> >>> They've been slowly wiring up a VRAD behind my place for the last two >>> months. I'm curious to see what flavor of U-Verse they're actually >>> going to offer out of it. >> >> you'll have everything available. They're still AT&T though, so it's >> nickel-and-dime for everything. when I went on their website and >> spec'ed out what I wanted, the nickel-and-diming added a shitload to >> the advertised rates. > > Sometimes a phone call will get you a better deal. While the advertised > web site prices have to be low, they still have to have a spiff for the > CS people. yeah, my m-i-l has gotten that to work a bunch of times (she has all 3 on uverse), but when it's coming up $40-50 more than I'd pay RCN, I doubt they're going to be able to cut it that much.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnjs06us.7qh.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni49025pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net> <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <slrnjrsv34.gkq.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <XnsA05E605A616B5VRI@66.246.138.5>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr753451pbc.1.1337990401651;
Fri, 25 May 2012 17:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni49025pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 23:55:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Enjoy the Ftupetemic!
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <slrnjs06us.7qh.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net>
<jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <slrnjrsv34.gkq.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
<XnsA05E605A616B5VRI@66.246.138.5>
Reply-To: glg@tanzenmb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1337990284 17282 66.246.138.5 (25 May 2012 23:58:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 23:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-16 (Linux)
X-Received-Bytes: 2981