Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse

Article View: chi.internet

Article #415

#415

From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 22:25

20 lines
2301 bytes

Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote:
> Michele Goudie <dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote:
>> On 5/25/2012 6:15 AM, Bruce Esquibel wrote:
>>> Michele Goudie<dont.even@trythisathome.com>  wrote:
>>> Just curious if your 10% went over 6mb from the normal fastest dsl or if was
>>> just some slower speed that picked up a bit for no reason.
>>
>> It would be the latter.  Things were maxing out around 3mb, now it's 
>> pushing 340k with some bursts up to 360k.  I'm not the one in charge of 
>> the DSL around here, so I have no idea if we're capped or if we're stuck 
>> with slow speeds in general.
>>
>> Never think to ask because the DSL's rarely under heavy use and there's 
>> no streaming video going on except from the intranet.
> 
> sounds like you have the "marketing" uverse like bruce does as opposed to
> anything coming out of one of those VRAD boxes.

maybe this explains the normal sized modems and the 1970s sized piece of 
shit I have. "real" uverse people get the stupid sized device?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni52529pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!panix.com!presence

References:

<jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net> <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <x-WdnfCDG-1P9CPSnZ2dnUVZ5hGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <jpnpjk$hpn$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr2998126pbc.8.1338071156304;
        Sat, 26 May 2012 15:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni52529pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!panix.com!presence
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 22:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <jpkgdr$110$5@news.albasani.net> <jples6$6hr$1@ftupet.ftupet.com> <x-WdnfCDG-1P9CPSnZ2dnUVZ5hGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <jpnpjk$hpn$2@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1338071152 11536 166.84.1.1 (26 May 2012 22:25:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 22:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2 (i386))

Reply to Parent Message