Article View: chi.internet
Article #420Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
From: Eric
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:18
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:18
39 lines
2936 bytes
2936 bytes
Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote in news:jq1hk0$ppn$5@reader1.panix.com: > Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >> Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> wrote: >>>Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> wrote: >>>>Michele Goudie <dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote: >>>>>On 5/25/2012 6:15 AM, Bruce Esquibel wrote: >>>>>>Michele Goudie<dont.even@trythisathome.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>Just curious if your 10% went over 6mb from the normal fastest dsl >>>>>>or if was just some slower speed that picked up a bit for no >>>>>>reason. >> >>>>>It would be the latter. Things were maxing out around 3mb, now >>>>>it's pushing 340k with some bursts up to 360k. I'm not the one in >>>>>charge of the DSL around here, so I have no idea if we're capped or >>>>>if we're stuck with slow speeds in general. >> >>>>>Never think to ask because the DSL's rarely under heavy use and >>>>>there's no streaming video going on except from the intranet. >> >>>>sounds like you have the "marketing" uverse like bruce does as >>>>opposed to anything coming out of one of those VRAD boxes. >> >>>maybe this explains the normal sized modems and the 1970s sized piece >>>of shit I have. "real" uverse people get the stupid sized device? >> >> Yes. My friend is in a Real U-verse area. I'm in a Fake U-verse area. >> We both have the same device you have. > > So real and fake uverse people al get the large stupid device? Bruce > has a normal sized device though. I have the huge device at home with the battery backup for the phone. At work I have a motorola device that's about 9 x 6. -- Coming to you from the beautiful Chicago suburbs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<XnsA06272E9F19EBVRI@66.246.138.5>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni62823pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com> <jprt4k$2fd$4@news.albasani.net> <jq1hk0$ppn$5@reader1.panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,921f0f40a1d2db04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr9896708pbc.2.1338308402483;
Tue, 29 May 2012 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pr3ni62823pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric <ericw2000@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: why the push for DSL->Uverse
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:18:18 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: VRI
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <XnsA06272E9F19EBVRI@66.246.138.5>
References: <jpjq78$8m1$1@dont-email.me> <gZOdnZ9Lp9tBwl3SnZ2dnUVZ5gKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnjs1o71.6rs.glg@ftupet.ftupet.com> <jprl9g$b8g$2@reader1.panix.com> <jprt4k$2fd$4@news.albasani.net> <jq1hk0$ppn$5@reader1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1338308268 6719 66.246.138.5 (29 May 2012 16:17:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Received-Bytes: 2466