Article View: chi.internet
Article #459Re: Google Chrome oddity
From: Kristian M Zoerhoff
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:38
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:38
38 lines
3016 bytes
3016 bytes
On 2012-09-29, Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote: > Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> wrote: >> Since no one posts here I thought I'd try and add something interesting. >> I put my PC on a quiet subnet to check on something and noticed google >> updates was phoning home every single minute using http with a rather >> lengthy session. This chatter was filling up my logs so I investigated >> and found an installation of google chrome had 3 processes running. >> After uninstalling google chrome all went away and my laptop is as quiet >> as a church mouse on the network. Since I use firefox exclusively I >> completely forgot I installed Chrome a bunch of months ago to try it >> out. I didn't know that having it installed meant that they could set >> up shop on my PC! And this much activity is rather obnoxious IMHO. > > > > Obnoxious maybe, evil, probably not. > > From what I understand (which is little), Chrome is unique because it's a > sandboxed browser. Other words, you shouldn't be able to hit a malicious > website which can grab your contacts/address book, plant viruses and so > forth. > > It's completely self-contained meaning it doesn't communicate or need calls > from the operating system and stays where it belongs. > > To get that to work, it needs to launch a bunch of background processes, > everything from the extentions you have loaded to the printer and updater. > These have to be in the sandbox with the application since they can't be > called if not there. > > I guess the main question is if they should continue to run after the main > application quits. I dunno. There's an option to control this. It's on by default, naturally. -- Kristian M Zoerhoff
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrn3vfsk6f54v.53n.kmz@otaku.freeshell.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g9ni6946pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.2ad036cf48a1c7c89899cc@news.speakeasy.net> <k46ovp$994$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e60788e9872e549b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.76.169 with SMTP id l9mr3467156paw.47.1348965602123;
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g9ni6946pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Kristian M Zoerhoff <kmz@lavabit.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: Google Chrome oddity
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:38:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: ftupet.com
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <slrn3vfsk6f54v.53n.kmz@otaku.freeshell.org>
References: <MPG.2ad036cf48a1c7c89899cc@news.speakeasy.net>
<k46ovp$994$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
Reply-To: kmz@lavabit.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1348965601 25148 66.246.138.5 (30 Sep 2012 00:40:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (NetBSD)
X-Received-Bytes: 2571
Bytes: 2683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit