🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: chi.internet
Article #459

Re: Google Chrome oddity

#459
From: Kristian M Zoerhoff
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:38
38 lines
3016 bytes
On 2012-09-29, Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> wrote:
> Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> wrote:
>> Since no one posts here I thought I'd try and add something interesting.  
>> I put my PC on a quiet subnet to check on something and noticed google 
>> updates was phoning home every single minute using http with a rather 
>> lengthy session.  This chatter was filling up my logs so I investigated 
>> and found an installation of google chrome had 3 processes running.  
>> After uninstalling google chrome all went away and my laptop is as quiet 
>> as a church mouse on the network.  Since I use firefox exclusively I 
>> completely forgot I installed Chrome a bunch of months ago  to try it 
>> out.  I didn't know that having it installed meant that they could set 
>> up shop on my PC!  And this much activity is rather obnoxious IMHO.
>
>
>
> Obnoxious maybe, evil, probably not.
>
> From what I understand (which is little), Chrome is unique because it's a
> sandboxed browser. Other words, you shouldn't be able to hit a malicious
> website which can grab your contacts/address book, plant viruses and so
> forth.
>
> It's completely self-contained meaning it doesn't communicate or need calls
> from the operating system and stays where it belongs.
>
> To get that to work, it needs to launch a bunch of background processes,
> everything from the extentions you have loaded to the printer and updater.
> These have to be in the sandbox with the application since they can't be
> called if not there.
>
> I guess the main question is if they should continue to run after the main
> application quits. I dunno. 

There's an option to control this. It's on by default, naturally.

-- 

Kristian M Zoerhoff
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrn3vfsk6f54v.53n.kmz@otaku.freeshell.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g9ni6946pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
References: <MPG.2ad036cf48a1c7c89899cc@news.speakeasy.net> <k46ovp$994$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,e60788e9872e549b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid837b0c45a0,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.76.169 with SMTP id l9mr3467156paw.47.1348965602123;
        Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g9ni6946pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.ripco.com!not-for-mail
From: Kristian M Zoerhoff <kmz@lavabit.com>
Newsgroups: chi.internet
Subject: Re: Google Chrome oddity
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:38:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: ftupet.com
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <slrn3vfsk6f54v.53n.kmz@otaku.freeshell.org>
References: <MPG.2ad036cf48a1c7c89899cc@news.speakeasy.net>
 <k46ovp$994$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com>
Reply-To: kmz@lavabit.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ftupet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: remote5bge0.ripco.com 1348965601 25148 66.246.138.5 (30 Sep 2012 00:40:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (NetBSD)
X-Received-Bytes: 2571
Bytes: 2683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit