Article View: chi.internet
Article #46843Re: Choices for LAN connections
From: Phil N. Schuman
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00
56 lines
3340 bytes
3340 bytes
> karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes: > Generally, you would not want UUCP, as that is batch mode only. What you > would be looking for from MCSNet, as an example, is a LINK account, which is > full IP access. If you're in dedicated mode then you want your mail > delivered via SMTP to a local mail gateway (CCMail and MSMail have these > products available, albiet at a fairly high cost). > This kind of link runs anywhere from $125 a month on up, depending on speed. > Examples are $450/month for 56kbps, $250/month for 1B ISDN, $400/month for > 2b ISDN, and $1250 a month for T1 LV (avg use under 128kbps, but full > bandwidth is available.) All of these have an additional component -- that > of the physical line and possible usage (in the case of ISDN) from either > Ameritech or a CAP (competitive access provider) such as MFS. does the LINK account then support the entire LAN - with let's say 45 IP addresses, or is an account required for EACH user on the LAN? I thought the LINK account was about $200/month for EACH heavy duty nailed up user? In other words - what would be the TOTAL cost to support 45 users in this manner? > > >3) Install a LAN/Internet Gateway (we are leaning this way) > > > >the gateway has only a single IP address - and can provide a dialup (analog or ISDN) > >connection to support a minimal amount of traffic - great for the occasional set of users. > >These were just recently detailed in PC magazine - though we have been looking at one > >for a few months now.... > >However - we still have the E-mail question and set of choices. > > 1) Stay with the single account name/password for ALL e-mail? > > No; if you get a LINK account in this environment you can run your CCMail or > other gateway on the LAN and use two IP addresses. > > > 2) Purchase additional E-mail accounts (45 of them) for each person? > > I wouldn't recommend this, but you *could* do that kind of thing. but - you mention the ELINK account below for this exact purpose? > > > 3) Stay with our ATTmail account and our local LAN server? > > 4) Have the ISP's support this new breed of connection ( the LAN Gateway) > > with a special type of account that conserves IP addresses, yet yields additional > > paid E-mail addresses. > > This is relatively simple if you use, for example, ELINK accounts here for > email storage. You can connect to the mail server via POP3 over a dedicated > line in this environment yet keep the mail here. For some this is an idea > situation -- for others, it stinks. It just depends on what you're looking > for. so - Karl - what are other folks doing in this pretty typical LAN-based situation - and which types of accounts are used, and what would be the monthly investment to support these 45 OCCASIONAL users for E-mail, and the other Web, FTP, News services? Phil -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3te9e0$s8a@News1.mcs.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3te7f3$nch@Venus.mcs.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,fed36d76fcb2563c X-Google-Attributes: gid10d5fa,public From: pschuman@interserv.com (Phil N. Schuman) Subject: Re: Choices for LAN connections Date: 1995/07/05 Message-ID: <3te9e0$s8a@News1.mcs.net> X-Deja-AN: 105766276 references: <3te7f3$nch@Venus.mcs.com> organization: MCSNet Internet Services newsgroups: chi.internet