Article View: chi.internet
Article #46846Re: Choices for LAN connections
From: Karl Denninger
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00
77 lines
4215 bytes
4215 bytes
In article <3tdl7a$8fe@news1.mcs.net>, Phil N. Schuman <pschuman@interserv.com> wrote: >We have 45 folks on a Novell 4.1 LAN that need occasional access to various >things on the 'Net - FTP, News, Listservs, E-mail, Web pages. >We have been using ATTmail for years - and it is currently connected to the LAN >via MSmail and a bi-directional dialup gateway. > >I'm looking for some discussion on the choices - > >1) Install 45 dialup modems/lines and get 45 personal accounts. > (I don't think so) This is sometimes a good choice, and sometimes a bad one. Depends on your environment. If you're seriously security-paranoid, this is your best bet. We have a number of large corporations which have MCSNet block accounts that do exactly this for both security and "roaming" (ie: access from home) reasons. >2) Install IP dual stack, install router on LAN, and then get ???? account >to support Internet full function access. > >Just what type of account would we get - >and would the E-mail be at the ISP, or would we need an E-mail server. >Is the UUCP type of account usually the one used to support a LAN/router network? Generally, you would not want UUCP, as that is batch mode only. What you would be looking for from MCSNet, as an example, is a LINK account, which is full IP access. If you're in dedicated mode then you want your mail delivered via SMTP to a local mail gateway (CCMail and MSMail have these products available, albiet at a fairly high cost). This kind of link runs anywhere from $125 a month on up, depending on speed. Examples are $450/month for 56kbps, $250/month for 1B ISDN, $400/month for 2b ISDN, and $1250 a month for T1 LV (avg use under 128kbps, but full bandwidth is available.) All of these have an additional component -- that of the physical line and possible usage (in the case of ISDN) from either Ameritech or a CAP (competitive access provider) such as MFS. Other ISPs are similar in the way they set this kind of thing up. >3) Install a LAN/Internet Gateway (we are leaning this way) > >the gateway has only a single IP address - and can provide a dialup (analog or ISDN) >connection to support a minimal amount of traffic - great for the occasional set of users. >These were just recently detailed in PC magazine - though we have been looking at one >for a few months now.... >However - we still have the E-mail question and set of choices. > 1) Stay with the single account name/password for ALL e-mail? No; if you get a LINK account in this environment you can run your CCMail or other gateway on the LAN and use two IP addresses. > 2) Purchase additional E-mail accounts (45 of them) for each person? I wouldn't recommend this, but you *could* do that kind of thing. > 3) Stay with our ATTmail account and our local LAN server? > 4) Have the ISP's support this new breed of connection ( the LAN Gateway) > with a special type of account that conserves IP addresses, yet yields additional > paid E-mail addresses. This is relatively simple if you use, for example, ELINK accounts here for email storage. You can connect to the mail server via POP3 over a dedicated line in this environment yet keep the mail here. For some this is an idea situation -- for others, it stinks. It just depends on what you're looking for. >I appreciate any and all comments and discussions on these topics. >Phil - -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | (shell, PPP, SLIP, leased) in Chicagoland Voice: [+1 312 248-8649] | 7 Chicagoland POPs, ISDN, 28.8, much more Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net ISDN - Get it here TODAY! | Home of Chicago's only FULL AP Clarinet feed!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3te7f3$nch@Venus.mcs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3tdl7a$8fe@news1.mcs.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,fed36d76fcb2563c X-Google-Attributes: gid10d5fa,public From: karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) Subject: Re: Choices for LAN connections Date: 1995/07/05 Message-ID: <3te7f3$nch@Venus.mcs.com> X-Deja-AN: 105924058 references: <3tdl7a$8fe@news1.mcs.net> organization: MCSNet Ops, Chicago, IL newsgroups: chi.internet